Category / NLR_V_53
PODISINGHO et al., Appellants, and THE KING, Respondent
009-NLR-NLR-V-53-PODISINGHO-et-al.-Appellants-and-THE-KING-Respondent.pdf Podisingho r_ The King 40 [Court of Criminal Appeal,] 1951Present :Dias S.P.J. (President), Basnayake <1.,Gnnasekara J.f Pnlle J. and de Silva J.PODISINGHO et al., Appellants, and THE KING, RespondentAppeals 45-48 with Applications 61-64 of 1951S. C. 32—<!f. 0. Ratnapura, 18,478 Criminal procedure—Joint trial of several persons—Discretion of Court, to orderseparate trials—Criminal Procedure Code,…
KULANTHAVELU, Appellant, and MUTHUSAMY AIYAB Respondent
025-NLR-NLR-V-53-KULANTHAVELU-Appellant-and-MUTHUSAMY-AIYAB-Respondent.pdf 142 BASNAYAKE J.—Kulanthavelu o. Muthusamy Aiyar 1950Present : Basnayake J. KULANTHAVELU, Appellant, and MUTHUSAMYAIYAR Respondent S. C. 72—C. R. Trinoomalec, 8,141 Court of Requests—Appeal—Matters of law not stated in petition of appeal—CivilProcedure Code, s. 383k. In an action for debt, damage or demand, where there is no right of appealfrom a judgment pronounced…
K. D. T. PERERA, Applellant, and THE KING, Respondent
041-NLR-NLR-V-53-K.-D.-T.-PERERA-Applellant-and-THE-KING-Respondent.pdf K. D. J. Perera v. The King 198 [Court of Criminal Appeal] 1951 Present : Nagalingam S.P.J. (President), Gonasekera J., Pnlle J., Swan J., and de Silva J. K.D. J. PERERA, Appellant, and THE KING, Respondent Application 85 of 1951 S.C. 16—M. C. Badulla, 11,357 Provocation—Charge of murder—Plea of grave and sudden provocation—Mode…
SAMARASINGHE, Appellant , and PANNASARA THERO et al., Respondents
057-NLR-NLR-V-53-SAMARASINGHE-Appellant-and-PANNASARA-THERO-et-al.-Respondents.pdf Samarasinghe v. Pannasara Thero 2711 1951Present: Dias S.P.J. and Gunasekara J.SAMABASINGHE, Appellant, and PANNASABA THEBOet al., Bespondents S. C. 70—D. C. Colombo, 4,476/L Pleadings—Amendment—Scope of. The two plaintiffs, who were Bujldhist monks, sought to vindicate title to alaDd ill (heir personal capacity on the footing that it was their private pudgalikaproperty. During the…
SOORANAMMAH, Appellant, and AMIRNATHAPPILLAI et al., Respondents
073-NLR-NLR-V-53-SOORANAMMAH-Appellant-and-AMIRNATHAPPILLAI-et-al.-Respondents.pdf 334 Sooranammah v. Amirnathapillui 1950Present : N&galingam J. and Polle J.SOORANAMMAH, Appellant, and AMIRNATHAPILLAI et aX., Respondents S. C. 18—D. C. (Testy.) Jaffna, 730 Company Lata—Allotment of additional shares—Does nut■ always signify profits— Thesa valamai—Thediathedd am. Out of the dowry money of a wife who was subject to the Thesavalainai,25 Bhares in a…
JAMIS, Appellant, and THE QUEEN, Respondent
089-NLR-NLR-V-53-JAMIS-Appellant-and-THE-QUEEN-Respondent.pdf 401 GRATIAEN J.—-Jamis v. The Quern [Court of Criminal Appeal] ■1952 Present: Nagalingam A.C.J. (President), Gratiaen J.,Gnnasekara J., Pulle J. and de Silva J.J.MIS, Appellant, and THE QUEEN, Bespondent Appplication No. 18 of 1952 S. C. 4—-V. <7. Kuruneijala, 1,92J ■ Penal Code. s. 294—Exception 1—Charge of murder—Plea of grace and suddenprovocation—Test of…
SALIH, Appellant and FERNANDO et al., Respondents
105-NLR-NLR-V-53-SALIH-Appellant-and-FERNANDO-et-al.-Respondents.pdf Salih v. Fernando 1951 466 Present ; Gpatiaen J. and Gnnasekara J.SALIH, Appellant, and FLRNAHDO et al., RespondentsS. C. 258—D. G. Colombo, 17,762jM Contract—Bailment—Heirloom—Failure of bailee to deliver goods entrusted— Measure of damages-—Market value—Sentimental value. PlaintiffB entrusted certain articles of jewellery to the defendant, who wasa jeweller, for the purpose of repairing them.…
CHRISTIE, Appellant and MOHAMED BHAI, Respondent
121-NLR-NLR-V-53-CHRISTIE-Appellant-and-MOHAMED-BHAI-Respondent.pdf 1952 Christie o. Mohamed Bhai Present : Rose C.J. CHRISTIE, Appellant and MOHAMED BHAI, Respondent S. C. 192—C. R. Nuwara Eliya, 18,656 ’iinoT—Contract—Loan—Benefit to minor—Onus of proof. In regard to the liability of a minor to repay a loan, the emus of proof iiminor to show that he has received no benefit. 1…
SEEDIN, Appellant, and THEDIYAS, Respondent
010-NLR-NLR-V-53-SEEDIN-Appellant-and-THEDIYAS-Respondent.pdf BOSIi C-T.—Scedin c. Thcdiyax ia 1981Present : Rose C.J.SEEDIN, Appellant, and THEDIYAS. Respondent- S.C. 174—C. R. Matara, 3,092 Partition decree—Creates new title in the parties—Married Women's PropertyOrdinance (Cap. 46), s. 10 (1). Partition decrees are not, like other decrees affecting land, merely declaratoryof the existing rights of the parties inter sc. They create…
PUNCHI SINGHO, Petitioner, and B. H. PERERA, Respondent
026-NLR-NLR-V-53-PUNCHI-SINGHO-Petitioner-and-B.-H.-PERERA-Respondent.pdf 148 GDNASEKABA J.—Punchi Singho v. B. H. Perera Present: Gunasekara J.PUNCHI SINGHO, Petitioner, and B. H. PERERA, Respondent S. 0. 478—Application for a Writ of Quo Warranto Writ of quo warranto—Office already vacant at the time application is made—Doeswrit lie t An application for a mandate in the nature of a writ of…