Category / NLR_V_62
DAVITH APPUHAMY, Appellant, and PEDURU NAIDE, Respondent
005-NLR-NLR-V-62-DAVITH-APPUHAMY-Appellant-and-PEDURU-NAIDE-Respondent.pdf 16 BASNAYAKE, C.J.—Davith Appuhamy v. Peduru N aide Present : Basnayake, C.J., and Sansoni, J. DAVITH APPUHAMY, Appellant, and PEDURU NAIDE, Respondent S.C. 31 Inty.—D. C. Kurunegala, 8437jP Appeal—Arbitration by Court—Right of appeal. Where, in an action, relating to a land, the parties agreed to be boundby the order which the Court would…
THE CHETTINAD CORPORATION LTD, Appellant, and GAMAGE and another, Respondent
021-NLR-NLR-V-62-THE-CHETTINAD-CORPORATION-LTD-Appellant-and-GAMAGE-and-another-Respondent.pdf 86 The Chettinad Corporation Ltd. v. Carnage Present: Basnayake, C.J., and H. N. G. Fernando, J. THE CHETTINAD CORPORATION DTD., Appellant, and GAMAGE and another, Respondents S. C. 107—G. R. Colombo, 60478 Rent Restriction Act, No. 29 of 1948—Sub-letting—Condonation by landlord—Land-lord's right to eject tenant-.—Standard rent—Computation when rented premisesare subsequently consolidated with adjoining…
P. M COORAY et al , Appellants, and M. A. P. WIJESURYA, Respondent
037-NLR-NLR-V-62-P.-M-COORAY-et-al-Appellants-and-M.-A.-P.-WIJESURYA-Respondent.pdf 168 Oooray v. Wijeeuriya Present: Basnayake, C.J., ‘and Sinnetamby, J.P. M. COORAY et al., Appellants, and M. A. P.WIJESURIYA, Respondent S. G. 26—D. C. Kalutara, 29505JL Partition action—Duty of Court to examine title of each 'party—Proof of pedigree—-Statements in deeds—Evidential value thereof—Partition Act, No. 16 of 1951 r88. 25, 26 {f), 48—Evidence Ordinance,…
RICHARD PIERIS & CO LTD, Appellant, and D. J. WIJESIRIWARDENA, Respondent
053-NLR-NLR-V-62-RICHARD-PIERIS-CO-LTD-Appellant-and-D.-J.-WIJESIRIWARDENA-Respondent.pdf T. S. FERNANDO, J.—Richard Bieris <&s Go. Ltd., v. Wijesiriwardena 233 1960Present: T. S. Fernando, J.RICHARD PIERTS & CO. LTD., Appellant, and J. WTJESIRIWARDENA, Respondent S. C. (Labour Tribunals') 5—Labour Tribunal Case 123 of 1959 Industrial Disputes Act, No. 43 of 1950, as amended by Act No. 62 of 1957—■Termi-nation of workman’s services—Gratuity…
S. B. L. PERERA, Petitioner, and THE CHAIRMAN, URBAN COUNCIL, DEHIWALA-MT. LAVIN
069-NLR-NLR-V-62-S.-B.-L.-PERERA-Petitioner-and-THE-CHAIRMAN-URBAN-COUNCIL-DEHIWALA-MT.-LAVIN.pdf H. N. G. FERNANDO, J-—Per era, v. Chairman, Urban Council, Dehiwela- 383 Jkft. Lavinia 1960Present : H. N. G. Fernando, J.S.B. L. PERERA, Petitioner, and THJE CITAIRMAN, URBANCOUNCIL., DEHIWELA-MT. LAVINIA, Respondent S. C. 608—In the matter of an Application for a Mandate in thenature of a Writ of Mandamus under Section 42 of…
THE QUEEN, Appellant, and P. EDIRIMANASINGHAM, Respondent
085-NLR-NLR-V-62-THE-QUEEN-Appellant-and-P.-EDIRIMANASINGHAM-Respondent.pdf 452 The Queen v. Edirimanasingham [In The Privy Council] Present:Lord Reid, Lord Tucker, Lord Denning, Lord Morris ol Borth-y-Gest, Mr. L. M. D. de Silva THE QUEEN, Appellant, and P. EUIRIMAN AS INGHAM, Respondent Privy Cou-ncil Appeal No. 12 of 1960C. C. A. Appeal 106 of 195SS. C. 4—M. C. JBatticaloa, 1925 Sentence—Trial…
R. S. THAMBIRAJAH, Appellant,and T. MAHESWARI, Respondent
101-NLR-NLR-V-62-R.-S.-THAMBIRAJAH-Appellantand-T.-MAHESWARI-Respondent.pdf 619 Thambxrajah v. Mahestvari 1961Present :Sinnetamby, J., and L. B. de Silva, J.R.S. THAMRIRAJAH, Appellant, and T. MAHESWARI, Respondent S.C. 394—.D. G. Colombo, 21633jS Promissory note—Action instituted by indorsee against makei Issue raised as to fact of indorsement—Burden of proof—JVo presumption in favour of valid or genuineindorsement—Bills of Exchange Ordinance, ss. 2, 21…
CARUPPIAH , Appellant, and COMMISSIONER FOR REGISTRATION OF INDIAN AND PAKISTANI
006-NLR-NLR-V-62-CARUPPIAH-Appellant-and-COMMISSIONER-FOR-REGISTRATION-OF-INDIAN-AND-PAKISTANI.pdf STHNETAMBY, J.Carupjriah v. Commissioner for Registration, of Indian and Pakistani Residents 17 1960Present : Sinnetamby, J. CARUPPIAH, Appellant, and COMMISSIONER EOR REGISTRATIONOP INDIAN AND PAKISTANI RESIDENTS. Respondent S. C. 121—1. P. R. C. No. 1532 Indian and Pakistani Residents {Citizenship) Act, Ho. 3 of 1949—-Applicatioti mndeiherexiruler-^lAffidavit not properly signed—Effect. Once an application for…
S. RAMASAMY, APPELLANT, AND D. D. FONSEKA, Respondent
022-NLR-NLR-V-62-S.-RAMASAMY-APPELLANT-AND-D.-D.-FONSEKA-Respondent.pdf 90 W EERASOORi Y A, J.:—Ramasamy v. Ferns elect Present: Weerasooriya, J. S. RAMASAMY, Appellant, and D. L>. FONSEELA, RespondentS. C. 11—C. R. Colombo, 66165 (R. E.) Fresh evidence—Admissibility. In an application to lead certain fresh evidence in the form of two documentswhich were stated to have been discovered subsequent to the tried…
FERNANDO . Appellant, and COREA, Respondent
038-NLR-NLR-V-62-FERNANDO-.-Appellant-and-COREA-Respondent.pdf 164 BASN'AYAKJE f C.J.—Fernando v. Corea 1960Present: Basnayake, C.J., and Sansoni, J. FERNANDO, Appellant, and COREA, RespondentS. C. 568—D. G. Chilaw, 14214 Appeal—Stamps for decree of Supreme Court—Duty payable—Stamp OrdinanceSchedule A, Part II. When an appeal ib preferred to the Supreme Court, the value of the action,for the purpose of stamp duty is…