Category / NLR_V_71
R. S. JAYANETTI, Petitioner, and K. M. MARTINUS and 5 others Respondents
009-NLR-NLR-V-71-R.-S.-JAYANETTI-Petitioner-and-K.-M.-MARTINUS-and-5-others-Respondents.pdf H. N. G. FERNANDO, C.J.—Jayanelli v. Martiniu 40 1968 Present: H. H. G. Fernando, CJ., and Weenmantiy, J.S. JAYANETTI, Petitioner, and K. M. MARTINUS and 6 others, Respondents S. C. 414165—Application, for a Mandate in the nature of a Writ of Certiorarion Captain (S) K. M. Martiniu, Royal Ceylon Navy, and five others…
J. W. DE ALWIS, Petitioner, and V. C. DE SILVA (Director of Public Works ), Res
025-NLR-NLR-V-71-J.-W.-DE-ALWIS-Petitioner-and-V.-C.-DE-SILVA-Director-of-Public-Works-Res.pdf 108 ALLES, J.—De A lifts t>. De Silva 1967Present: AUes, J., and Tennekoon, J.J.W. DE ALWIS, Petitioner, and V. C. DE SILVA (Director ofPublic Works), Respondent 8. C. 265/67—Application fcrr the issue of a Mandate in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus l'vl'lir. officers—Ceyton Government Manual oj Procedure, as. 46, 47—AdministrativeRegulations made…
MARIYATHASAN, Petitioner, and MARGARET, ROSE (wife of Mariyathasan ), Respondent
041-NLR-NLR-V-71-MARIYATHASAN-Petitioner-and-MARGARET-ROSE-wife-of-Mariyathasan-Respondent.pdf 164 Mariyathasan v. Rose – 1968Present: Tamblah, i. MARIYATHASAN, Petitioner, and MARGARET ROSE (wife ofMariyathasan), Respondent 8. C. 471/67—Application in Revision in M. C. Jaffna, 33353 Criminal Procedure Code—Sections 413 and 419—Seizure of movable property byPolice—No offence proved against accused—Jurisdiction of Magistrate to dealwith the property seized—Scope. When a police officer seizes any…
E. S. PEIRIS and another, Petitioners, and W.P. SAMARAWEERA, Respondent
057-NLR-NLR-V-71-E.-S.-PEIRIS-and-another-Petitioners-and-W.P.-SAMARAWEERA-Respondent.pdf 250 , Petrie v. Samaraweera 1967Present: G. P. A. Silva, J. E. S. PEERIS and another, Petitioners, and W. P. SAMARAWEERA, Respondent Election Petition No. 1 of 1967—Welimada [Electoral District No. 126) Election petition—Disqualification of candidate mho potted the largest number of votes—notoriety of such disqualification—Prayer for declaration that the candidate whopolled the…
SUPERINTENDENT, MULANA ESTATE, MAKANDURA, Appellant, and JANIS APPU DIDDENIPOTA,
073-NLR-NLR-V-71-SUPERINTENDENT-MULANA-ESTATE-MAKANDURA-Appellant-and-JANIS-APPU-DIDDENIPOTA.pdf 332 DE KRETSER, J.—Superintendent, Mulana Estate, Makandura v. Diddenipota 1968Present: de Kretser, J. SUPERINTENDENT, MULANA ESTATE, MAKANDURA,Appellant, and JANIS APPU DIDDENIPOTA, Respondent 8. G. 6/68—Labour Tribunal Case No. G12901 Industrial Disputes Act, as amended by Act No. 62 of 1957—Section 31D—Appealthereunder to Supreme Court—Time limit for filing petition of appeal—Computation—Industrial Disputes Regulations, 1958,…
P.L. PREMADASA and 3 others, Petitioners, and THE QUEEN, Respondent
089-NLR-NLR-V-71-P.L.-PREMADASA-and-3-others-Petitioners-and-THE-QUEEN-Respondent.pdf Prtmadaaa v. The Queen 42d 1967Present: Slrimane, J.P.L. PREMADASA and 3 others, Petitioners, and THE QUEEN, Respondent S. C. 213 A-D /67~Application for Bail under Section 31 of the CourtsOrdinance in M. C. Trincomcdee, 2660 Courts Ordinance—Section 31—Application for bail thereunder—“ Good cause Shownto the contrary". In an application for bail under Section…
A. I. JAFFERJEE and 7 others , Petitioners and R. SUBRAMANIAM and others, Respo
105-NLR-NLR-V-71-A.-I.-JAFFERJEE-and-7-others-Petitioners-and-R.-SUBRAMANIAM-and-others-Respo.pdf 518 Jqfferjee v. Subramaniam 1969 Present: Sirimane, J., and Pandita Gunawardene, J.A. I. JAFFERJEE and 7 others, Petitioners, and R.SUBRAMANIAM and others, Respondents 8. C. 299/68—Application for a Writ of Prohibition Labour Tribunals—Mode of appointing them—Scope of their jurisdiction—Power ofMinister to select any particular labour tribunal to hear an industrial dispute—Industrial Disputes Act…
K. D. EDWIN PEERIS and another, Appellants, and S. KIRILAMAYA, Respondent
010-NLR-NLR-V-71-K.-D.-EDWIN-PEERIS-and-another-Appellants-and-S.-KIRILAMAYA-Respondent.pdf Peeris v. kirHamayd 52 Present: T. S. Fernando, A.CJL, and Siva Supramanlam, J.K.D. EDWIN PEERIS and another. Appellants,and S. KIRILAMAYA, RespondentS. C. 211 of 1965—D. C. Ratnapura, 4870 Prescription—Hiwel ande—Nature oj tenure—Usufructuary mortgagee—Date ofcommencement of adverse possession by him—Addition of parties—Judgmentin favour of a person who is not a party—Invalidity. Where a hiwel…
A. I. JAFFERJEE and others, Appellants and THE CEYLON MERCANTILE UNION, Respon
026-NLR-NLR-V-71-A.-I.-JAFFERJEE-and-others-Appellants-and-THE-CEYLON-MERCANTILE-UNION-Respon.pdf ] 12 Jafferjce v. Ceylon Mercantile Union 1968 Present: H. N. G. Fernando, C.J., and Abeyesundere, i. A. I. JAFFERJEE and others, Appellants, and THE CEYLONMERCANTILE UNION, Respondent S. C. 419-422f67—Applications for Mandates in the nature ofWrits of Certiorari and Prohibition Industrial dispute—Dismissal of a workman by his employer —Reference for arbit ratio…
K. C. C. PERERA, Appellant, and K.M. PERERA, Respondent
042-NLR-NLR-V-71-K.-C.-C.-PERERA-Appellant-and-K.M.-PERERA-Respondent.pdf 161 t)E KRETSEB.J.—Perera v. Perera 1968 Present: H. N. G. Fernando, C.J., and de Kretser, J. K.G. G. PERERA, Appellant, and K.'M. PERERA, Respondent S.C. 617166—D. C. Colombo, 21227/S Cheques—Notice of dishonour—Burden of proof—Effect of words "Not arrangedfar " noted on the cheques. In an action on two dishonoured cheques on which were…