Category / NLR_V_78
J. WEERASINGHE, Appellant and REV. PANDIT DICKWELLA NAYAKA THERO, Respondent
004-NLR-NLR-V-78-J.-WEERASINGHE-Appellant-and-REV.-PANDIT-DICKWELLA-NAYAKA-THERO-Respondent.pdf 0 Weerasinghe v. Rev. Pandit Dickwella Nayaka Thero 1975 Present : Sirimane, J., Wijesundera, J., andWeeraratne, J. J.WEERASINGHE, Appellant and REV. PANDIT DICKWELLANAYAKA THERO, Respondent Conciliation Boards Act—Section 6—Arising of a “ dispute ” confersjurisdiction on Conciliation Board—"Dispute" arises partly in oneConciliation Board area and partly in another area—Either Boardhas jurisdiction. ft) It…
M. A. MOHIDEEN, Plaintiff- Appellant-Petitioner, and M. S. MOHIDEEN, Defendant-
020-NLR-NLR-V-78-M.-A.-MOHIDEEN-Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner-and-M.-S.-MOHIDEEN-Defendant-.pdf 108 TENNEKOON, C. J.—>Mohideen v. Mohideen 1975 Present :Tennekoon, C.J, Samerawickrame, J., Udalagama,J., Tittawella, J., and Sharvananda, J M.A. MOHIDEEN, Plain tiff-Appellant-Petitioner, and M. S-MOHIDEEN, Defendant-Respondent-RespondentS. C. 23/1972, Court of Appeal 19/1973—C. R. Colombo 1980/R. E. Rent Restriction Act as amended by Act No. 12 of 1966—Section 12A(1)(a) — Termination of Contract of…
S. A. KANAGASABAI, Petitioner, and M. K. MYLWAGANAM, Respondent
036-NLR-NLR-V-78-S.-A.-KANAGASABAI-Petitioner-and-M.-K.-MYLWAGANAM-Respondent.pdf 280 S H ARVANAN DA J.■—Kanagasabai v. Alyl vagan am 1976 Present : Sharvananda, J., and Wanasundera, J.S. A. KANAGASABAI, Petitioner, and M- K. MYLWAGANAM, Respondent S. C. Application 471/76—M.C. Colombo 42282/1 Administration of Justice Law—Sections 62, 63, 65—Relevance of 'suitpending in civil court—Conditions precedent to the exercise ofjurisdiction—Meaning of dispute affecting land.…
NESARATNAM, window of KANDIAHPILLAI, Appellant and K. VAITHILINGAM, Responden
052-NLR-NLR-V-78-NESARATNAM-window-of-KANDIAHPILLAI-Appellant-and-K.-VAITHILINGAM-Responden.pdf TENNEKOON, C.J.—Nesaratnarn v. Vailhilingam 457 1975 Present: Tennekoon, C. J., Pathirana, J., and Vythialingam, J. NESARATNAM, widow of KANDIAHPILLAI, Appellant and K.VAITHILINGAM, Respondent S. C. 264/70 (F)—D. C. Jaffna D/1092 Civil Procedure Code—Sections 341, 338 (3), 394 (2)—Whether executorde son tort can be made respondent to application under Section341(1)—Do the words “executor or…
M. S. PERUMAL, Petitioner, and E. NANAYAKKARA, Respondent
068-NLR-NLR-V-78-M.-S.-PERUMAL-Petitioner-and-E.-NANAYAKKARA-Respondent.pdf Perumal v. Nanayalckara 873 1977Present .-Weeraratne, J., Vythialingam, J., and Colin Thome, J. M. S. PERUMAL, Petitioner, and E. NANAYAKKARA, Respondent S C. 55/76—D. C. Colombo 988/43/73 Conciliation Boards Act-—Settlement of dispute between landlord andtenant—Validity of such settlement—Rent Act No. 7 of 1972—Section 22 thereof. In an application to revise a settlement of…
T. M. SITA KUMARI TENNEKOON, Applicant- Appellant and T. N. R. B. TENNEKOON, De
005-NLR-NLR-V-78-T.-M.-SITA-KUMARI-TENNEKOON-Applicant-Appellant-and-T.-N.-R.-B.-TENNEKOON-De.pdf Tennekoon v. Tennekoon 13 Present: Wijayatilake, J. and Malcolm Perera, J.T.M. SITA KTJMARI TENNEKOON, Applicant-Appellant andT.N.R.B. TENNEKOON, Defendant-Respondent S.C. 766/72—M.C. Mahawa 23920 Maintenance Ordinance Section 6—Corroborationof mother’s evidence—“ at or about the time ” of sexual intimacy.—S. 157of the Evidence Ordinance. Evidence—Impeaching the credit of a witness—Proof of formerstatements—Evidence Ordinance sections 145, 155.…
SOLOMON FERNANDO, Defendant-Appellant and CHANDRALATHA ABEYSEKERA, Applicant-
021-NLR-NLR-V-78-SOLOMON-FERNANDO-Defendant-Appellant-and-CHANDRALATHA-ABEYSEKERA-Applicant-.pdf DEHERAGODA, J.—Solomon Fernando v. Chandralatha Abeysekera 119 Present: Deheragoda, J. SOLOMON FERNANDO, Defendant-Appellant andCHANDRALATHA ABEYSEKERA, Applicant-Respondent S. C. 237/71—M. C. Colombo 5516/A Maintenance Ordinance—Illegitimate child—Corroboration of mother’sevidence—Section 6. In an application for maintenance of an illegitimate child underSection 6 of the Maintenance Ordinance, the Magistrate ought inthe first instance to analyse the evidence…
THE ESTATES AND AGENCY COMPANY LTD., Petitioner, and P. J. S. A. PERERA and ot
037-NLR-NLR-V-78-THE-ESTATES-AND-AGENCY-COMPANY-LTD.-Petitioner-and-P.-J.-S.-A.-PERERA-and-ot.pdf The Estates and Agency Company^Ltd. v. Perera 289 1975 Present : Weeraratne, J., Sliarvananda, J., and Ratwatte, J. THE ESTATES AND AGENCY COMPANY LTD., Petitioner,and P. J. S. A. PERERA and others, Respondents S. C. 2/73—Applications for Mandates in the nature of writs ofCertiorari and Prohibition under Section 42 of the CourtsOrdinance. Industrial…
GETAMANNE SARANAPALA TERUNNANSE, Appellant, and TARAPERIYA SORATHA THERO, Respon
053-NLR-NLR-V-78-GETAMANNE-SARANAPALA-TERUNNANSE-Appellant-and-TARAPERIYA-SORATHA-THERO-Respon.pdf S HUMANE, J.—Saranapalu. Terunnan.se v. Soratha Thero 471 1975 Present: Sirimane, J., Vythialingam, J., and Sharvananda, J. GETAMANNE SARANAPALA TERUNNANSE, Appellant, andTARAPERIYA SORATHA THERO, Respondent S. C. 657/69 (F)—D. C. Tangalla 1172/L Buddhist ecclesiastical law—Law of pupillary succession— Rule ofSisyanu Sisya Paramparawa—Incumbent disrobes leaving nopupils—Right of co-pupil in the same line to succeed.…
R. G. W. APPUHAMY, Accused- Appellant and THE REPUBLIC OF SRILANKA
006-NLR-NLR-V-78-R.-G.-W.-APPUHAMY-Accused-Appellant-and-THE-REPUBLIC-OF-SRILANKA.pdf 25 SIRIMANE, J.—Appuhamy v. The Republic of Sri Lanka Present: Sirimane, J., Wijesundera, J. and Ratwatte, J. R. G. W. APPUHAMY, Accused-Appellant and THE REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA S. C. 50/74—H. C. Ratnapura 753/73 Criminal Law—plea of self-defence by one of the accused-effect ofacquittal of co-accused. Where the 1st accused admitted the shooting…