Evidence Ordinance

evidence-ordinance

EVIDENCE [Cap. 14CHAPTER 14EVIDENCEAN ORDINANCE TO CONSOLIDATE, DEFINE, AND AMEND THELAW OF EVIDENCE. Ordinances,Nos. 14 of 1895,15 of 1904,16 of 1925,25 of 1927,18 of 1928,1 of 1946,Acts,Nos.3 of 1961,10 of 1988,33 of 1998,32 of 1999.[1st January,1896.]PART IRELEVANCY OF FACTSCHAPTER IPRELIMINARY1. This Ordinance may be cited as the Evidence Short title.Ordinance.2. (1)This Ordinance shall apply to all judicial pro- Extent.ceedings; in or before any court other than courtsmartial, but not to proceedings before an arbitrator.(2) All rules of evidence not contained in any Repeal.written law so far as such rules are inconsistent withany of the provisions of this Ordinance, are herebyrepealed.3. In this Ordinance the following words and Interpretation.expressions are used in the following senses, unless acontrary intention appears from the context: —” court ” includes all Judges and Magistrates, and allpersons, except arbitrators, legally authorized to takeevidence.” Fact ” means and includes—(a) any thing, state of things, or relation of thingscapable of being perceived by the senses ;(b) any mental condition of which any person isconscious.Illustrations(a) That there are certain objects arranged in a certainorder in a certain place is a fact.(b) That a man heard or saw something is a factCap. 14] EVIDENCE(c) That a man said certain words is a fact.(d) That a man holds a certain opinion, has a certainintention, acts in good faith or fradulently, or uses aparticular word in a particular sense, or is or wasat a specified time conscious of a particular sensation, is a fact .(e) That a man has a certain reputation is a fact.Relevant. One fact is said to be relevant to another when theone is connected with the other in any of the waysreferred to in the provisions of this Ordinance relatingto the relevancy of facts.Facts in issue. ” Facts in issue ” means and includes—any facts from which, either by itself or in connection with other facts, the existence, nonexistence, nature, or extent of any right,liability, or disability, asserted or denied inany suit or proceeding, necessarily follows.Explanation.—Whenever, under the provisions of the lawfor the time being in force relating to Civil Procedure,any court records an issue of fact, the fact to be assertedor denied, in the answer to such issue, is a fact in issue.IllustrationsA is accused of the murder of B. At his trial the followingfacts may be in issue: —That A caused B’s death.That A intended to cause B’s death.That A had received grave and sudden provocationfrom B.That A, at the time of doing the act which caused B’sdeath, was by reason of unsoundness of mindincapable of knowing its nature.Document. “Document” means any matter expressed ordescribed upon any substance by means of letters,figures, or marks or by more than one of those means,intended to be used, or which may be used, for thepurpose of recording that matter.IllustrationsA writing is a document.Words printed, lithographed, or photographed are documents.A map or plan is a document.An inscription on a metal plate or stone is a document.A caricature is a document.198EVIDENCE [Cap. 14″ Evidence ” means and includes— Evidence.(a) all statements which the court permits orrquires to be made before it by witnesses inrelation to matters of fact under inquiry;such statements are called oral evidence;(b) all documents produced for the inspection ofthe court; such documents are called documentary evidence.A fact is said to be proved when, after considering Proved.the matters before it, the court either believes it toexist or considers its existence so probable that aprudent man ought, under the circumstances of theparticular case, to act upon the supposition that itexists.A fact is said to be disproved when, after considering Disproved.the matters before it, the court either believes that itdoes not exist, or considers its non-existence so probable that a prudent man ought, under the circumstances of the particular case, to act upon thesupposition that it does not exist.A fact is said not to be proved when it is neither Not proved.proved nor disproved.4. (1) Whenever it is provided by this Ordinance May presume.that the court may presume a fact, it may either regardsuch fact as proved, unless and until it is disproved, ormay call for proof of it.(2) Whenever it is directed by this Ordinance that Shall presume.the court shall presume a fact, it shall regard such factas proved unless and until it is disproved.(3) When one fact is declared by this Ordinance to Conclusivebe conclusive proof of another, the court shall on proof proof.of the one fact regard the other as proved, and shall notallow evidence to be given for the purpose of disprovingit.CHAPTER IIOF THE RELEVANCY OF FACTS5. Evidence may be given in any suit or proceeding Evidence mayof the existence or non-existence of every fact in issue, be given of factsand of such other facts as are hereinafter declared to in issue andbe relevant and of no others. relevant facts.199Cap. 14] EVIDENCEExplanation.—This section shall not enable any person togive evidence of a fact which he is disentitled to proveby any provision of the law for the time being in forcerelating to Civil Procedure.Relevancy offacts formingpart of sametransaction.Illustrations(a) A is tried for the murder of B by beating him with aclub with the intention of causing his death.At A’s trial the following facts are in issue:—A’s beating B with the club;A’s causing B’s death by such beating;A’s intention to cause B’s death.(b) A, a party to a suit, does not comply with a notice givenby B, the other party, to produce for B’s inspection adocument referred to in A’s pleadings. This sectiondoes not enable A to put such document in evidenceon his behalf in such suit, otherwise than in accordance with the conditions prescribed by section 104 ofthe Civil Procedure Code.6. Facts which though not in issue are so connectedwith a fact in issue as to form part of the same transaction are relevant, whether they occurred at the sametime and place or at different times and places.Facts which arethe occasion,cause, or effectof facts in issue.Illustrations(a) A is accused of the murder of B by beating him. Whatever was said or done by A or B or the bystanders atthe beating, or so shortly before or after it as toform part of the transaction is a relevant fact(b) A is accused of waging war against the Republic by takingpart in an armed insurrection in which property isdestroyed, troops are attacked, and jails are brokenopen The occurrence of these facts is relevant asforming part of the general transaction, though Amay not have been present at all of them.(c) A sues B tor a libel contained in a letter forming partof a correspondence. Letters between the partiesrelating to the subject out of which the libel aroseand forming part of the correspondence in which itis contained are relevant facts, though they do notcontain the libel itself.(d) The question is, whether certain goods ordered from Bwere delivered to A. The goods were delivered toseveral intermediate persons successively. Eachdelivery is a relevant fact.7. Facts which are the occasion, cause, or effect,immediate or otherwise, of relevant facts, or facts inissue, or which constitute the state of things underwhich they happened, or which afforded an opportunityfor their occurrence or transaction, are relevant.200EVIDENCE [Cap. 14Illustrations(a) The question is, whether A robbed B.The facts that shortly before the robbery B went to a fairwith money in his possession, and that he showed it,or mentioned the fact that he had it, to third persons,are relevant.(b) The question is, whether A murdered B.Marks on the ground, produced by a struggle at or near theplace where the murder was committed, are relevantfacts.(c) The question is, whether A poisoned B.The state of B’s health before the symptoms ascribed topoison, and habits of B, known to A, which affordedan opportunity for the administration of poison, arerelevant facts.8. (1) Any fact is relevant which shows or constitutes a motive or preparation for any fact in issue orrelevant fact.(2) The conduct of any party, or of any agent toany party, to any suit or proceeding in reference tosuch suit or proceeding or in reference to any fact inissue therein or relevant thereto, and the conduct ofany person an offence against whom is the subject ofany proceeding, is relevant, if such conduct influencesor is influenced by any fact in issue or relevant fact,and whether it was previous or subsequent thereto.Explanation 1.—The word “conduct” in this section doesnot include statements, unless those statements accompany and explain acts other than statements, but thisexplanation is not to affect the relevancy of statementsunder any other section of this Ordinance.Explanation 2—When the conduct of any person is relevant, any statement made to him or in his presence andhearing, which affects such conduct, is relevant.Illustrations(a) A is tried for the murder of B.The facts that A murdered C, that B knew that A hadmurdered C, and that B had tried to extort moneyfrom A by threatening to make his knowledge public,are relevant.(b) A sues B upon an instrument for the payment ofmoney. B denies the making of the instrument.The fact that at the time when the instrument was allegedto be made B required money for a particular purpose is relevant.(c) A is tried for the murder of B by poison.The fact that before the death of B, A procured poisonsimilar to that which was administered to B, isrelevant.201Motive, orpreparation.Previous orsubsequentconduct.Cap. 14] EVIDENCE(d) The question is, whether a certain document is thewill of A.The facts that not long before the date of the alleged willA made inquiry into matters to which the provisionsof the alleged will relate, that he consulted attornys-at-lawin reference to making the will, and that he causeddrafts of other wills to be prepared, of which he didnot approve, are relevant.(e) A is accused of a crime.The facts that either before or at the time of, or after thealleged crime, A provided evidence which wouldtend to give to the facts of the case an appearancefavourable to himself, or that he destroyed or concealed evidence, or prevented the presence orprocured the absence of persons who might havebeen witnesses, or suborned persons to give falseevidence respecting it, are relevant.(f) The question is, whether A robbed B.Tlie facts that after B was robbed C said in A’s presence,” the police are coming to look for the man whorobbed B “, and that immediately afterwards A ranaway, are relevant.(g) The question is, whether A owes B Rs. 10,000.The facts that A asked C to lend him money, and that Dsaid to C in A’s presence and hearing, ” I advise younot to trust A, for he owes B 10,000 rupees” andthat A went away without any answer, are relevantfacts.(h) The question is whether A committed a crime.The fact that A absconded after receiving a letter warninghim that inquiry was being made for the criminal,and the contents of the letter, are relevant.(i) A is accused of a crime.The facts that after the commission of the alleged crime heabsconded, or was in possession of property or theproceeds of property acquired by the crime, orattempted to conceal things which were or mighthave been used in committing it, are relevant.(j) The question is, whether A was ravished.The fact that shortly after the alleged rape she made acomplaint relating to the crime, the circumstancesunder which and the terms in which the complaintwas made, are relevant.The fact that, without making a complaint, she said thatshe had been ravished, is not relevant as conductunder this section, though it may be relevant as adying declaration under section 32, subsection (1),or as corroborative evidence under section 157.(k) The quesiton is whether A was robbed.The fact that soon after the alleged robbery he made acomplaint relating to the offence, the circumstancesunder which and the terms in which the complaintwas made, are relevant.The fact that he said he had been robbed, without makingany complaint, is not relevant as conduct under thissection though it may be relevant as a dyingdeclaration under section 32, subsection (1), or ascorroborative evidence under section 157.202EVIDENCE [Cap. 149. Facts necessary to explain or introduce a fact inissue or relevant fact, or which support or rebut aninference suggested by a fact in issue or relevant fact,or which establish the identity of anything or personwhose identity is relevant, or fix the time or place atwhich any fact in issue or relevant fact happened, orwhich show the relation of parties by whom any suchfact was transacted, are relevant in so far as they arenecessary for that purpose.Illustrations(a) The question is, whether a given document is the willof A. The state of A’s property and of his family atthe date of the alleged will may be relevant facts.(b) A sues B for a libel imputing disgraceful conduct to A.B affirms that the matter alleged to be libellous istrue.The position and relations of the parties at the time whenthe libel was published may be relevant facts asintroductory to the facts in issue. The particulars of adispute between A and B about a matter unconnectedwith the alleged libel are irrelevant, though the factthat there was a dispute may be relevant if it affectedthe relations between A and B.(c) A is accused of a crime.The fact that soon after the commission of the crimeA absconded from his house, is relevant, undersection 8, as conduct subsequent to and affected byfacts in issue.The fact that at the time when he left home he had suddenand urgent business at the place to which he went, isrelevant, as tending to explain the fact that he lefthome suddenly.The details of the business on which he left are not relevant, except in so far as they are necessary to show that the business was sudden and urgent.(d) A sues B for inducing C to break a contract of servicemade by him with A. C, on leaving A’s service, saysto A, ” I am leaving you because B has made me abetter offer”. This statement is a relevant fact asexplanatory of C’s conduct, which is relevant as a fact in issue.(e) A, accused of theft, is seen to give the stolen propertyto B, who is seen to give it to A’s wife. B says, as hedelivers it. ” A says you are to hide this “. B’s statement is relevant, as explanatory of a fact which ispart of the transaction.(f) A is tried for a riot, and is proved to have marched atthe head of a mob. The cries of the mob are relevantas explanatory of the nature of the transaction.10. Where there is reasonable ground to believe thattwo or more persons have conspired together to commitan offence or an actionable wrong, anything said, done,or written by any one of such persons in reference totheir common intention, after the time when such203Facts necessaryto explain orintroducerelevant facts.Things said ordone byconspiratorin reference tocommonintention.Cap. 14] EVIDENCEWhen facts nototherwiserelevant arerelevant.intention was first entertained by any .one of them, isa relevant fact as against each of the persons believedto be so conspiring, as well for the purpose of provingthe existence of the conspiracy as for the purposeof showing that any such person was a party to it.IllustrationReasonable ground exists for believing that A has joinedin a conspiracy to wage war against the Republic.The facts that B procured arms in Europe for the purposeof the conspiracy, C collected money in Colombo for alike object, D persuaded persons to join the conspiracyin Kandy, E published writings advocating the object inview at Galle, and F transmitted from Kalutara to G atNegombo the money which C had collected at Colombo,and the contents of a letter written by H giving anaccount of the conspiracy, are each relevant, both to provethe existence of the conspiracy and to prove A’s complicity in it, although he may have been ignorant of all ofthem, and although the persons by whom they were donewere strangers to him, and although they may have takenplace before he joined the conspiracy or after he left it.11. Facts not otherwise relevant are relevant—(a) if they are inconsistent with any fact in issue orrelevant fact;(b) if by themselves or in connection with otherfacts they make the existence or non-existenceof any fact in issue or relevant fact highlyprobable or improbable.In suits fordamages factstending toenable court todetermineamount arerelevant.Illustrations(a) The question is, whether A committed a crime atColombo on a certain day.The fact that on that day A was at Galle is relevant.The fact that near the time when the crime was committedA was at a distance from the place where it wascommitted, which would render it highly improbable,though not impossible, that he committed it, isrelevant.(b) The question is, whether A committed a crime.The circumstances are such that the crime must have beencommitted either by A, B, C, or D. Every fact whichshows that the crime could have been committedby no one else, and that it was not committed byeither B, C or D, is relevant.12. In suits in which damages are claimed, any factwhich will enable the court to determine the amountof damages which ought to be awarded is relevant.20413. Where the question is as to the existence ofany right or custom the following facts are relevant:—(a) any transaction by which the right or custom inquestion was created, claimed, modified,recognized, asserted, or denied, or which wasinconsistent with its existence ;(b) particular instances in which the right orcustom was claimed, recognized, or exercised,or in which its exercise was disputed, asserted,or departed from.IllustrationThe question is, whether A has a right to a fishery. A deedconferring the fishery on A’s ancestors, a mortgage of thefishery by A’s father, a subsequent grant of the fisheryby A’s father irreconcilable with the mortgage, particularinstances in which A’s father exercised the right, or inwhich the exercise of the right was stopped by A’s neighbours, are relevant facts.14. Facts showing the existence of any state ofmind—such as intention, knowledge, good faith, negligence, rashness, ill-will or good-will towards anyparticular person, or showing the existence of anystate of body or bodily feeling—are relevant, when theexistence of any such state of mind, or body, or bodilyfeeling is in issue or relevant.Explanation 1.—A fact relevant as showing the existenceof a relevant state of mind must show that the state ofmind exists, not generally, but in reference to theparticular matter in question.Explanation 2.—But where, upon the trial of a personaccused of an offence, the previous commission by theaccused of an offence is relevant within the meaning ofthis section, the previous conviction of such person shallalso be a relevant fact.IllustrationsFacts relevantwhen right orcustom is inquestion.Facts showingexistence ofstate of mindor of body, orbodily feeling.A is accused of receiving stolen goods knowing them tobe stolen. It is proved that he was in possession of aparticular stolen article.(a)The fact that at the same time he was in possession of manyother stolen articles is relevant, as tending to showthat he knew each and all of the articles of which hewas in possession to be stolen.(b) A is accused of fradulently delivering to anotherperson a counterfeit coin which, at the time when hedelivered it, he knew to be counterfeit.The fact that A had been previously convicted of deliveringknowing it to be counterfeit is relevant.Cap. 14] EVIDENCE(c) A sues B for damage done by a dog of B’s which Bknew to be ferocious.The facts that the dog had previously bitten X, Y, and Z,and that they had made complaints to B, are relevant.(d) The question is whether A, the acceptor of a bill ofexchange, knew that the name of the payee was fictitious.The fact that A had accepted other bills drawn in the samemanner before they could have been transmitted tohim by the payee, if the payee had been a realperson, is relevant, as showing that A knew that thepayee was a fictitious person.(e) A is accused of defaming B by publishing an imputation intended to harm the reputation of B.The fact of previous publications by A respecting B, showing ill-will on the part of A towards B, is relevant, asproving A’s intention to harm B’s reputation by theparticular publication in question.The facts that there was no previous quarrel between A andB, and that A repeated the matter complained of ashe heard it, are relevant, as showing that A did notintend to harm the reputation of B.(f) A is sued by B for fradulently representing to Bthat C was solvent, whereby B, being induced to trustC, who was solvent, suffered loss.The fact that at the time when A represented C to besolvent, C was supposed to be solvent by hisneighbours and by persons dealing with him, isrelevant, as showing that A made the representationin good faith.(g) A is sued by B for the price of work done by B upon ahouse of which A is owner, by the order of C, acontractor. A’s defence is that B’s contract was withC.The fact that A paid C for the work in question is relevant,as proving that A did in good faith make over to Cthe management of the work in question, so that Cwas in a position to contract with B on C’s ownaccount, and not as agent for A.(h) A is accused of the dishonest misappropriation ofproperty which he had found, and the question iswhether, when he appropriated it, he believed in good faith that the real owner could not be found. The fact that public notice of the loss of the property had been given in the place where A was is relevant, as showing that A did not in good faith believe that the real owner of the property could not befound.The fact that A knew, or had reason to believe, that thenotice was given fradulently by C, who had heardof the loss of the property and wished to set up afalse claim to it, is relevant as showing that the factthat A knew of the notice did not disprove A’s goodfaith.(i) A is charged with shooting at B with intent to kill him.In order to show A’s mtent, the fact of A havingpreviously shot at B may be proved.(j) A is charged with sending threatening letters to B.Threatening letters previously sent by A to B maybe proved as showing the intention of the letters.(k) The question is, whether A has been guilty of crueltytowards B, his wife.Expressions of their feeling towards each other shortlybefore or after the alleged eruefty are relevant facts.206EVIDENCE [Cap.14(l) The question is, whether A’s death was caused bypoison.Statements made by A during his illness as to hissymptoms are relevant facts.(m) The question is, what was the state of A’s health atthe time when an assurance on his life was effected.Statements made by A as to the state of his health at ornear the .time in question are relevant facts.(n) A sues B for negligence in providing him with acarriage for hire not reasonably fit for use, wherebyA was injured.The fact that B’s attention was drawn on other occasionsto the defect of that particular carriage is relevant.The fact that B was habitually negligent about the carriageswhich he let to hire is irrelevant.(o) A is tried for the murder of B by intentionally shootinghim dead.The fact that A, on other occasions shot at B is relevant,as showing his intention to shoot B.The fact that A was in the habit of shooting at people withintent to murder them is irrelevant.(p) A is tried for a crime.The fact that he said something indicating an intention to commit that particular crime is relevant.The fact that he said something indicating a generaldisposition to commit crimes of that class isirrelevant.15. When there is a question whether an act wasaccidental or intentional or done with a particularknowledge or intention, the fact that such act formedpart of a series of similar occurrences, in each ofwhich the person doing the act was concerned, isrelevant.Illustrations(a) A is accused of burning down his house in order toobtain money for which it is insured.The facts that A lived in several houses successively, eachof which he insured, in each of which a fire occurred,and after each of which fires A received paymentfrom a different insurance office, are relevant as tending to show that the fires were not accidental.(b) A is employed to receive money from the debtors ofB. It is A’s duty to make entries in a book showingthe amounts received by him. He makes an entryshowing that on a particular occasion he receivedless than he really did receive.The question is, whether this false entry was accidental orintentional.The facts that other entries made by A in the same bookare false, and that the false entry is in each case infavour of A, are relevant.(c) A is accused of fraudulently delivering to B acounterfeit rupee.The question is, whether-the delivery at the rupee wasaccidental.Facts bearingon questionwhether act wasaccidental orintentional.Cap. 14] EVIDENCEExistence ofcourse ofbusiness, whenrelevant.The facts that soon before or soon after the delivery to B,A delivered counterfeit rupees to C, D, and E, arerelevant, as showing that the delivery to B was notaccidental.16. When there is a question whether a particularact was done, the existence of any course of business,according to which it naturally would have been done,is a relevant fact.(a) The questiondespatched.Illustrationsis, whether a particular letter wasThe facts that it was the ordinary course of business forall letters put in certain place to be carried to thepost, and that that particular letter was put in thatplace, are relevant.(b) The question is, whether a particular letter reachedA.The facts that it was posted in due course and was notreturned through the dead letter office are relevant.ADMISSIONS AND CONFESSIONSAdmissionsdefined.Confessiondefined.Admissionby party toproceeding, orhis agent;by suitor inrepresentativecharacter ;by partyinterested insubject-matter ;17. (1) An admission is a statement, oral or documentary, which suggests any inference as to any factin issue or revelant fact, and which is made by anyof the persons and under the circumstances hereinafter mentioned.(2) A confession is an admission made at any timeby a person accused of an offence stating or suggestingthe inference that he committed that offence.18. (1) Statements made by a party to the proceeding, or by an agent to any such party, whom thecourt regards, under the circumstances of the case, asexpressly or impliedly authorized .by him to makethem, are admissions.(2) Statements made by parties to suits suing orsued in a representative character are not admissions,unless they were made while the party making themheld that character.(3) Statements made by_(a) persons who have any proprietary or pecuniaryinterest in the subject-matter of the proceeding, and who make the statement in theircharacter of persons so interested; orEVIDENCE(b) persons from whom the parties to the suit havederived their interest in the subject-matterof the suit,are admissions if they are made during the continuanceof the interest of the persons making, the statements.19. Statements made by persons whose position orliability it is necessary to prove as against any partyto the suit are admissions if such statements wouldbe relevant as against such persons in relation to suchposition or liability in a suit brought by or againstthem, and if they are made whilst the person makingthem occupies such position or is subject to suchliability.IllustrationsA undertakes to collect rents for B.B sues A for not collecting rent due from C to B.A denies that rent was due from C to B.A statement by C that he owed B rent is an admission,and is a relevant fact as against A, if A denies that C didowe rent to B.20. Statements made by persons to whom a partyto the suit has expressly referred for information inreference to a matter in dispute, are admissions.IllustrationsThe question is, whether a horse sold by A to B is sound.A says to B, “Go and ask C ; C knows all about it”. C’sstatement is an admission.21. Admissions are relevant and may be proved asagainst the person who makes them, or his representative in interest; but they cannot be proved by or onbehalf of the person who makes them or by hisrepresentative in interest, except in the followingcases:—(a) an admission may be proved by or on behalfof the person making it when it is of such anature that, if the person making it were dead,it would be relevant as between third personsunder section 32;(b) an admission may be proved by or on behalfof the person making it when it consists of astatement of the existence of any state ofmind or body, relevant or in issue, made at or209Admissions bypersons expressIy referred to byparty to suit.Proof of admissions against theperson whomakes them orhis representative in interest.[Cap. 14by preson fromwhom interestderived.Admissions bypersons whoseposition must beproved asagainst partyto suit.Cap. 14] EVIDENCEWhen oral admissions as tocontents ofdocuments arerelevant.about the time when such state of mind orbody existed, and is accompanied by conductrendering its falsehood improbable;(c) an admission may be proved by or on behalfof the person making it if it is relevant otherwise than as an admission.Illustrations(a) The question between A and B is, whether a certaindeed is or is not forged. A affirms that it is genuine,B that it is forged.A may prove a statement by B that the deed is genuine,and B may prove a statement by A that the deed isforged; but A cannot prove a statement by himselfthat the deed is genuine nor can B prove a statementby himself that the deed is forged.(b) A, the captain of a ship, is tried for casting her away.Evidence is given to show that the ship was taken out ofher proper course.A produces a book kept by him in the ordinary course of his business, showing observations alleged to havebeen taken by him from day to day and indicatingthat the ship was not taken out of her proper course.A may prove these statements, because they wouldbe admissible between third parties if he were dead,under section 32, subsection (2).(c) A is accused of a crime committed by him at Colombo.He produces a letter written by himself and dated at Jaffnaon that day, and bearing the Jaffna postmark of thatday.The statement in the date of the letter is admissible, becauseif A were dead it would be admissible under section 32, subsection (2).(d) A is accused of receiving stolen goods knowing themto be stolen.He offers to prove that he refused to sell them belowtheir value.A may prove these statements though they are admissions.because they are explanatory of conduct influencedby facts in issue.(e) A is accused of fraudulently having in his possessioncounterfeit coin, which he knew to be counterfeit.He offers to prove that he asked a skilful person to examinethe coin, as he doubted whether it was counterfeitor not, and that that person did examine it and toldhim it was genuine.A may prove these facts for the reasons stated in the lastpreceding illustration.22. Oral admissions as to the contents of a documentare not relevant, unless and until the party proposingto prove them shows that he is entitled to givesecondary evidence of the contents of such documentsunder the rules hereinafter contained, or unless thegenuineness of a document produced is in question.210EVIDENCE [Cap. 1423. In civil cases no admission is relevant if it ismade either upon an express condition that evidenceof it is not to be given, or under circumstances fromwhich the court can infer that the parties agreedtogether that evidence of it should not be given.Explanation. —Nothing in this section shall be taken toexempt any attorney-at-law from giving evidenceof any matter of which he may be compelled to giveevidence under section 126.Admissions incivil cases whenrelevant.24. A confession made by an accused person is irrelevant in a criminal proceeding if the making of theconfession appears to the court to have been causedby any inducement, threat, or promise having referenceto the charge against the accused person, proceedingfrom a person in authority, or proceeding fromanother person in the presence of a person in authorityand with his sanction, and which inducement, threat,or promise is sufficient in the opinion of the court togive the accused person grounds, which would appearto him reasonable, for supposing that by making it hewould gain any advantage or avoid any evil of atemporal nature in reference to the proceedings againsthim.Confessioncaused byinducement,threat or promise irrelevant.25. (1) No confession made to a police officer shallbe proved as against a person accused of any offence. Confessioto a policeofficer nont t madeo beproved againstan accusedperson.(2) No confession made to a forest officer withrespect to an act made punishable under the ForestOrdinance, or to an excise officer with respect to anact made punishable under the Excise Ordinance, shallbe proved as against any person making suchconfession.Confession madeto a forestofficer or an excise officer notto be provedagainst personmaking confes-26. (1) No confession made by any person whilsthe is in the custody of a police officer, unless it bemade in the immediate presence of a Magistrate, shallbe proved as against such person.Confession madeby any personwhile in custodyof a police officernot to be provedagainst him.Cap. 14] EVIDENCEConfession madeby any personwhile in the custody of a forestofficer or an excise officer notto be provedagainst him.How much ofinformationreceived fromaccused maybe proved.Meaning ofterms ” forestofficer ” and”excise officer”.Confession madeafter removal ofimpressioncaused by inducement,threat, or promise, relevant.Confessionotherwiserelevantnot to becomeirrelevant because of promiseof secrecy, &c.(2) No Confession made by any person in respect ofan act made punishable under the Forest Ordinance,or the Excise Ordinance, whilst such person is in thecustody of a forest officer or an excise officer, respectively, shall be proved as against such person, unlesssuch confession is made in the immediate presence ofa Magistrate.27. (1) Provided that, when any fact is deposed toas discovered in consequence of information receivedfrom a person accused of any offence, in the custody ofa police officer, so much of such information, whetherit amounts to a confession or not, as relates distinctlyto the fact thereby discovered may be proved.(2) Subsection (1) shall also apply mutatis mutandis, in the case of information received from a personaccused of any act made punishable under the ForestOrdinance , or the Excise Ordinance, when such personis in the custody of a forest officer or an excise officer,respectively.27A. In sections 25, 26 and 27, the terms “forestofficer” and ” excise, officer” shall have the samemeanings as are respectively assigned to those termsin the Forest Ordinance, and the Excise Ordinance.28. If such a confession as is referred to in section24 is made after the impression caused by any suchinducement, threat, or promise has, in the opinion ofthe court, been fully removed, it is relevant.29. If such a confession is otherwise relevant, it doesnot become irrelevant merely because it was madeunder a promise of secrecy or in consequence of a deception practised on the accused person for the purposeof obtaining it, or when he was drunk, or because itwas made in answer to questions which he need nothave answered, whatever may have been the form ofthose questions, or because he was not warned that hewas not bound to make such confession, and thatevidence of it might be given against him.212EVIDENCE [Cap. 1430. When more persons than one are being triedjointly for the same offence, and a confession made byone of such persons affecting himself and some otherof such persons is proved, the court shall not take intoconsideration such confession as against such otherperson.Explanation.—” Offence ” as used in this section includesthe abetment of or attempt to commit the offence.IllustrationA and B are jointly tried for the murder of C. It is provedthat A said, ” B and I murdered C “. The court shall notconsider the effect of this confession as against B.31. Admissions are not conclusive proof of thematters admitted, but they may operate as estoppelsunder the provisions hereinafter contained.Confession madeby one ofseveral personstried jointlyfor the sameoffence.Admissions notconclusive proofbut may estop.STATEMENTS BY PERSONS WHO CANNOT BE CALLEDAS WITNESSES32. Statements, written or verbal, of relevant factsmade by a person who is dead, or who cannot be found,or who has become incapable of giving evidence, orwhose attendance cannot be procured without anamount of delay or expense which, under the circumstances of the case, appears to the court unreasonable,are themselves relevant facts in the following cases :—(1) When the statement is made by a person as tothe cause of his death, or as to any of thecircumstances of the transaction which re- sulted in his death, in cases in which the causeof that person’s death comes into question.Such statements are relevant whether the personwho made them was or was not, at the time when theywhere made, under expectation of death, and whatevermay be the nature of the proceedings in which thecause of his death comes into question.(2) When the statement was made by such personin the ordinary course of business, and inparticular when it consists of any entry or ness ;memorandum made by him in books kept in213Cases in whichstatement ofrelevant factby person whois dead orcannot be found,&c, is relevant.When it relatesto cause ofdeath ;or is made incourse of busiCap. 14] EVIDENCEor againstinterest ofmaker;or gives opinionas to publicright or customor matters ofgeneral interest;or relates toexistence ofrelationship;or is made inwill or deed relating to familyaffairs ;or in documentrelating to transaction mentioned in section 13 (a) ;the ordinary course of business or in thedischarge of professional duty; or of anacknowledgment written or signed by him ofthe receipt of money, goods, securities, orproperty of any kind; or of a document usedin commerce written or signed by him, or ofthe date of a letter or other document usuallydated, written, or signed by him.(3) When the statement is against the pecuniary orproprietary interest of the person making it,or when if true, it would expose him or wouldhave exposed him to a criminal prosecutionor to a suit for damages.(4) When the statement gives the opinion of anysuch person as to the existence of any publicright or custom or matter of public or generalinterest, of the existence of which, if it existed,he would have been likely to be aware,and when such statement was made beforeany controversy as to such right, custom, ormatter had arisen.(5) When the statement relates to the existence ofany relationship by blood, marriage, or adoption between persons as to whose relationshipby blood, marriage, or adoption the personmaking the statement had special means ofknowledge, and when the statement was madebefore the question in dispute was raised.(6) When the statement relates to the existence ofany relationship by blood, marriage, or adoption between persons deceased, and is made inany will or deed relating to the affairs of thefamily to which any such deceased personbelonged, or in any family pedigree, or uponany tombstone, family portrait, or other thingon which such statements are usually made,and when such statement was made beforethe quetsion in dispute was raised.(7) When the statement is contained in any deed,will, or other document which relates to anysuch transaction as is mentioned in section 13,paragraph (a).214EVIDENCE [Cap. 14(8) When the statement was made by a number ofpersons, and expressed feelings or impressionson their part relevant to the matter inquestion.Illustrations(a) The question is, whether A was murdered by B, orwhether A died of injuries received in a transactionin the course of which she was ravished.The question is, whether she was ravished by B : orThe question is, whether A was killed by B under suchcircumstances that a suit would lie against B by A’swidow.Statements made by A as to the cause of his or her death,referring respectively to the murder, the rape, andthe actionable wrong under consideration, arerelevant facts.(b) The question is as to the date of A’s birth.An entry in the diary of a deceased surgeon, regularlykept in the course of business, stating that, on agiven day, he attended A’s mother and delivered herof a son, is a relevant fact.(c) The question is, whether A was in Colombo on a givenday.A statement in the diary of a deceased attorney-at-law regularlykept in the course of business, that, on a given day,the attorney-at-law attended A, at a place mentioned, inColombo, for the purpose of conferring with himupon specified business, is a relevant fact.(d) The question is, whether a ship sailed from Galleharbour on a given day.A letter written by a deceased member of a merchant’sfirm by which she was chartered to their correspondents in London to whom the cargo wasconsigned, stating that the ship sailed on a given dayfrom Galle harbour, is a relevant fact.(e) The question is, whether rent was paid to A for certainland.A letter from A’s deceased agent to B saying that he hadreceived the rent on A’s account and held it at A’sorders, is a relevant fact.(f) The question is, whether A and B were legallymarried.The statement of a deceased clergyman that he marriedthem under such circumstances that the celebrationwould be a crime is relevant.(g) The question is, whether A, a person who cannot befound, wrote a letter on a certain day.The fact that a letter written by him is dated on that dayis relevant.(h) The question is, what was the cause of the wreck ofa ship.A protest made by the captain, whose attendance cannotbe procured, is a relevant fact.215or is made byseveral persons,and expressesfeelings relevantto matter inquestion.Cap. 14] EVIDENCEEvidence in aformer judicialproceeding,when relevant.(i) The question is, whether a given road is a public way.A statement by A, a deceased grama niladhari,that the road was public, is a relevant fact.(j) The question is, what was the price of grain on acertain day in a particular market.A statement of the price made by a deceased broker in theordinary course of business is a relevant fact.(k) The question is, whether A, who is dead, was thefather of B,A statement by A that B was his son is a relevant fact.(i) The question is, what was the date of the birth of A.A letter from A’s deceased father to a friend announcingthe birth of A on a given day is a relevant fact.(m) The question is, whether, and when, A and B weremarried.An entry in a memorandum book by C, the deceasedfather of B, of his daughter’s marriage with A on agiven date, is a relevant fact.(n) A sues B for a libel expressed in a printed caricatureexposed in a shop window. The question is as tothe similarity of the caricature and its libellouscharacter.The remarks of a crowd of spectators on these points maybe proved.33. Evidence given by a witness in a judicial proceeding, or before any person authorized by law totake it, is relevant, for the purpose of proving, in asubsequent judicial proceeding, or in a later stage ofthe same judicial proceeding, the truth of the factswhich, it states, when the witness is dead or cannot befound, or is incapable of giving evidence, or is keptout of the way by the adverse party, or if his presencecannot be obtained without an amount of delay orexpense which, under the circumstances of the case,the court considers unreasonable :Provided—(a) that the proceeding was between the sameparties or their representatives in interest;(b) that the adverse party in the first proceedinghad the right and opportunity to cross- examine ;(c) that the questions in issue were substantiallythe same in the first as in the second proceeding.Explanation.—A criminal trial or inquiry shall be deemedto be a proceeding between the prosecutor and theaccused within the meaning of this section.216EVIDENCE [Cap. 14STATEMENTS MADE UNDER SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES34. Entries in books of account, regularly kept in the courseof business, are relevant, whenever they refer to a matter intowhich the court has to inquire, but such statements shall notalone be sufficient evidence to charge any person with liability.IllustrationA sues B for Rs. 1,000 and shows entries in his account books showing B to beindebted to him to this amount. The entries are relevant, but are not sufficientwithout other evidence to prove the debt.35. An entry in any public or other official book, register, orrecord, stating a fact in issue or relevant fact, and made by apublic officer in the discharge of his official duty, or by anyother person in performance of a duty especially enjoined bythe law of the country in which such book, register, or record iskept, is itself a relevant fact.35A. A statement of a fact contained in a record, compiled-(a) by any person in the course of any trade, business, oroccupation in which he is engaged or employed or forthe purposes of any paid or unpaid office held by suchperson; and(b) from information supplied to such person by any otherperson who had, or may reasonably supposed to havehad, personal knowledge of the matters dealt with in thatinformation,is a relevant fact:Entries in booksof accountwhen relevant.Entry in publicrecord made inperformance ofduty enjoined bylaw, whenrelevant.Statementscontained inrecords compiledon informationsupplied by thirdparties havingpersonalknowledge ofthe matterscontained insuchstatement, whenrelevant.[§ 2, 33 of 1998.]Provided that such a statement shall not be capable ofcorroborating the oral evidence of the person who originallysupplied the information from which the record containing thestatement was compiled.36. Statements of facts in issue or relevant facts, made inpublished maps or charts generally offered for public sale, or inmaps or plans made under the authority of Government, as tomatters usually represented or stated in such maps, charts, orplans, are themselves relevant facts.217Maps, charts andplans, whenrelevant.Cap. 14] EVIDENCEStatement as tofact of publicnature containedin any UnitedKingdom Act,enactment ornotificationwhen relevant.Statements inlaw books, whenrelevant.Statements as toage in acertificate of aMedicalPractitionerwhen relevant.[§ 3, 32 of 1999.]*37. When the court has to form an opinion as to the existenceof any fact of a public nature, any statement of it made in arecital contained in any Act of the Parliament of the UnitedKingdom, or in any enactment, or in any proclamation ornotification of the Government appearing in the Gazette, or inany printed paper purporting to be the London Gazette or theGovernment Gazette of any part of Her Majesty’s Reams andTerritories, or to be the Gazette issued by the Local Governmentof any part of such Realm or Teritory is a relevant fact.38. When the court has to form an opinion as to a law of anycountry, any statement of such law contained in a book purportingto be printed or published under the authority of the Governmentof such country, and to contain any such law, and any report ofa ruling of the courts of such country contained in a bookpurporting to be a report of such rulings, is relevant.38A. (1) Where a court is required to form an opinion as tothe age of a person, a statement in a certificate purporting to beissued by a Medical Practitioner as to the probable age of suchperson is relevant.(2) In this section, “Medical Practitioner” means a MedicalPractitioner registered under the Medical Ordinance.What evidence tobe given whenstatement formspart of aconversation,document, book,or series of lettersor papers.HOW MUCH OF A STATEMENT IS TO BE PROVED39. When any statement of which evidence is given formspart of a longer statement, or of a conversation, or part of anisolated document, or is contained in a document which formspart of a book, or of a connected series of letters or papers,evidence shall be given of so much and no more of the statement,conversation, document, book, or series of letters or papers asthe court considers necessary in that particular case to the fullunderstanding of the nature and effect of the statement, and ofthe circumstances under which it was made.Previous judgments relevant tobar a second suit ortrial.JUDGMENTS OF COURTS OF JUSTICE WHEN RELEVANT40. The existence of any judgment, order, or decree whichby law prevents any court from taking cognizance of a suit or* There shall be substituted for the reference to “Act of the Parliament of theUnited Kingdom” the phrase “Act of the Parliament of Sri Lanka” and thereference to “London Gazette etc.” be omitted therefrom in the event of astatutory reprint.217AEVIDENCE [Cap. 14holding a trial, is a relevant fact, when the question is, whethersuch court ought to take cognizance of such suit or to hold suchtrial.41. (1) A final judgment, order, or decree of a competentcourt, in the exercise of probate, matrimonial, admiralty, orinsolvency jurisdiction, which confers upon or takes away fromany person any legal character, or which declares any person tobe entitled to any such character, or to be entitled to any specificthing, not as against any specified person, but absolutely, isrelevant, when the existence of any such legal character, or thetitle of any such person to any such thing, is relevant.(2) Such judgment, or order, or decree is conclusive proof-(a) that any legal character which it confers accrued at thetime when such judgment, order, or decree came intooperation;(b) that any legal character to which it declares any suchperson to be entitled, accrued to that person at the timewhen such judgment, order, or decree declares it to haveaccrued to that person;(c) that any legal character which it takes away from anysuch person ceased at the time from which suchjudgment, order, or decree declared that it had ceasedor should cease; and( d) that any thing to which it declares any person to be soentitled was the property of that person at the time fromwhich such judgment, order, or decree declares that ithad been or should be his property.41A. (1) Where in an action for defamation, the questionwhether any person committed a criminal offence is a fact inissue, a judgment of any court in Sri Lanka recording a convictionof that person for that criminal offence, being a judgment againstwhich no appeal has been preferred within the appealable periodor which has been finally affirmed on appeal, shall be relevantfor the purpose of proving that such person committed suchoffence, and shall be conclusive proof of that fact.(2) Without prejudice to the provisions of subsection (1),where in any civil proceedings, the question whether any person,218Relevancy ofjudgments inprobate, &c.,jurisdiction.Relevancy ofjudgments &c.,recordingconvictions,in civilproceedings.[§3,33 of 1998.]Cap. 14] EVIDENCERelevancy ofjudgment &c.,recording findingsof adultery incivil proceedings.[§ 3, 33 of 1988.]whether such person is a party to such civil proceedings or not,has been convicted of any offence by any court or court martialin Sri Lanka, or has committed the acts constituting an offence,is a fact in issue, a judgment or order of such court or courtmartial recording a conviction of such person for such offence,being a judgment or order against which no appeal has beenpreferred within the appealable period, or which has been finallyaffirmed in appeal, shall be relevant for the purposes of provingthat such person committed such offence or committed the actsconstituting such offence.(3) In this section-“court martial” means a court martial constituted under theArmy Act or the Navy Act or the Air Force Act and theexpression “conviction” when used in relation to a courtmartial, means a conviction by such court martialconfirmed in accordance with the provisions of the lawunder which such court martial was constituted.41B. (1) Where in any civil proceedings, the questionwhether any person, whether such person is a party to such civilproceeding or not, has committed adultery is a fact in issue, anyjudgment, decree or order in any matrimonial proceedingsrecording a finding that such person has been found guilty ofadultery, being a decree, judgment or order from which therehas been no appeal within the appealable period or which hasbeen finally affirmed in appeal, shall be relevant for the purposeof proving that such person committed such adultery.(2) In this section, “matrimonial proceedings” means anaction for divorce a vinculo matrimonii or separation a mensaet thoro or proceedings had before a District Registrar pursuantto an application made to such District Registrar under section33 of the Kandyan Marriage and Divorce Act or proceedingshad before a Quazi or Special Quazi pursuant to an applicationfor divorce made under the Muslim Marriage and Divorce Act.Illustrations(a) B injures C while driving A’s car in the course of B’s employment withA.B is convicted for careless driving.EVIDENCE [Cap. 14In an action for damages instituted by C against A and B, B’sconviction is relevant.(b) A obtains a decree for divorce against B on the ground of B’s adulterywith C. C’s wife sues C for divorce on the ground of C’s adultery withB. The divorce decree is relevant to prove B’s adultery with C.41C. (1) Where in any civil proceedings, the questionwhether any person, whether such person is a party to such civilproceeding or not, is the father of a child is a fact in issue, anorder entered in any maintenance proceedings recording a findingthat such person is the father of such child, being an order fromwhich there has been no appeal within the appealable period orwhich has been finally affirmed in appeal, shall be relevant forthe purposes of proving that such person is the father of suchchild.Relevancy ofjudgments&c.,recordingfindings ofpaternity incivilproceedings.[§ 3, 33 of 1998.](2) In this section, “maintenance proceedings” meanproceedings had before a Magistrate pursuant to an applicationmade to such Magistrate for an order under section 2 of the*Maintenance Ordinance or proceedings had before a Quazipursuant to a claim made to such Quazi by, or on behalf of, achild, under the Muslim Marriage and Divorce Act.42. Judgments, orders, or decrees other than those mentionedin sections 41,4lA,4lB and 41C are relevant if they relate tomatters of a public nature relevant to the inquiry; but suchjudgments, orders, or decrees are not conclusive proof of thatwhich they state.IllustrationA sues B for trespass on his land. B alleges the existence of a public right ofway over the land, which A denies.The existence of a decree in favour of the defendant in a suit by A against C fora trespass on the same land, in which C alleged the existence of the sameright of way, is relevant, but it is not conclusive proof that the right of wayexists.43. Judgments, orders or decrees, other than those mentionedin sections 40, 41, 41A, 41B, 41C and 42 are irrelevant, unlessthe existence of such judgment, order, or decree is a fact in issue,or is relevant under some other provision of this Ordinance.Whenjudgments,&c., otherthan thosementionedin sections41,41A, 41Band 41C arerelevant.[§ 4,33 of 1998.]When judgments,&c., other thanthose mentionedin sections 40,41,41A, 41B, 41C and42 are relevant.[§ 5, 33 of 1998.]Cap. 14] EVIDENCEIllustrations(a) A and B separately sue C for a libel which reflectsupon each of them.C in each case says that thematters alleged to be libellous is true, and the circumstances are such that it is probably true in eachcase, or in neither.A obtains a decree against C for damages, on the groundthat C failed to make out his justification. The factis irrelevant as between B and C.(b) A prosecutes B for stealing a cow from him. B is convicted.A afterwards sues C for the cow, which B had sold to himbefore his conviction. As between A and C thejudgment against B is irrelevant.(c) A has obtained a decree for the possession of landagainst B; C, B’s son, murders A in consequence.The existance of the judgement is relevant, as showingmotive for a crime.(d) A is charged with theft and with having beenpreviously convicted of theft.The previous conviction is relevant as a fact in issue.(e) A is tried for the murder of B. The fact that B prosecuted A for libel, and that A was convicted andsentenced, is relevant under section 8, as showingthe motive for the fact in issue.Fraud, collusion,or incompetencyof court may beproved.[§ 6, 33 of 1998.]44. Any party to a suit or other proceeding may show thatany judgment, order, or decree which is relevant under sections40,41,41A, 41B, 41C or 42 and which has been proved by theadverse party, was delivered by a court not competent to deliverit, or was obtained by fraud or collusion.Cap. 14] EVIDENCEOpinions ofexperts.[§ 2, 1 of 1946.][ § 2, 1 of 1946]OPINIONS OF THIRD PERSONS WHEN RELEVANT45. When the court has to form an opinion as toforeign law, or of science, or art, or as to identity orgenuineness of handwriting or finger impressions,palm impressions or foot impressions, the opinionsupon that point of persons specially skilled in suchforeign law, science, or art, or in questions as toidentity or genuineness of handwriting or finger impressions, palm impressions or foot impressions, arerelevant facts.Such persons are called experts.Illustrations(a) The question is, whether the death of A was causedby poison.The opinions of experts as to the symptoms produced bythe poison by which A is supposed to have died arerelevant.(b) The question is, whether A, at the time of doing acertain act, was, by reason of unsoundness of mind,incapable of knowing ths nature of the act or thathe was doing what was either wrong or contrary tolaw.The opinions of experts upon the question whether thesymptoms exhibited by A commonly show unsoundness of mind, and whether such unsoundness of mindusually renders persons incapable of knowing thenature of the acts which they do, or of knowingthat what they do is either wrong or contrary to law,are relevant.(c) The question is, whether a certain document waswritten by A. Another document is produced whichis proved or admitted to have been written by A. The opinions of experts on the question whether the twodocuments were written by the same person or bydifferent persons, are relevant.220EVIDENCE [Cap. 1446. Facts not otherwise relevant are relevant ifthey support or are inconsistent with the opinions ofexperts, when such opinions are relevant.Illustrations(a) The question is, whether A was poisoned by a certainpoison.The fact that other persons who were poisoned by thatpoison exhibited certain symptoms which expertsaffirm or deny to be the symptoms of that poison, isrelevant.(b) The question is, whether an obstruction to a harbouris caused by a certain sea-wall.The fact that other harbours are similarly situated in otherrespects but, where there were no such sea-walls,began to be obstructed at about the same time, isrelevant.47. When the court has to form an opinion as to thepersons by whom any document was written orsigned, the opinion of any person acquainted with thehandwriting of the person by whom it is supposed tobe written or signed that it was or was not writtenor signed by that person is a relevant fact.Explanation.—A person is said to be acquainted with thehandwriting of another person when he has seen thatperson write, or when he has received documentspurporting to be written by that person in answer todocuments written by himself or under his authority andaddressed to that person, or when, in the ordinary courseof business, documents purporting to be written bythat person have been habitually submitted to him.IllustrationThe question is, whether a given letter is in the handwriting of A, a merchant in London.B is a merchant in Colombo, who has written lettersaddressed to A and received letters purporting to bewritten by him. C is B’s clerk, whose duty it was toexamine and file B’s correspondence. D is B’s broker, towhom B habitually submitted the letters purporting tobe written by A for the purpose of advising with himthereon.The opinions of B, C, and D on the question, whether theletter is in the handwriting of A, are relevant, thoughneither B, C, nor D ever saw A write.48. When the court has to form an opinion as to theexistence of any general custom or right, the opinion,as to the existence of such custom or right, of personswho would be likely to know of its existence if itexisted, are relevant.Facts bearingupon opinionsof experts.Opinion as tohand writing.Opinion as toexistence ofright orcustom, whenrelevant.Cap. 14] EVIDENCEOpinion as tousages, tenets&c., whenrelevant.Opinion onrelationship,whenrelevant.Grounds ofopinion, whenrelevant.Explanation.—The expression “general custom or right”includes customs or rights common to any considerableclass of persons.IllustrationThe right of the inhabitants of a particular village to usethe water of a particular well is a general right withinthe meaning of this section.49. When the court has to form an opinion as to—(a) the usages and tenets of any body of men orfamily;(b) the constitution and government of any religious or charitable foundation ; or(c) the meaning of words or terms used in particular districts or by particular classes ofpeople;the opinions of persons having special means of knowledge thereon are relevant facts.50. When the court has to form an opinion as to therelationship of one person to another, the opinion,expressed by conduct, as to the existence of suchrelationship of any person who, as a member of thefamily or otherwise, has special means of knowledgeon the subject, is a relevant fact:Provided that such opinion shall not be sufficent toprove a marriage in proceedings for divorce, or inprosecutions under sections 362B, 362C, and 362D of thePenal Code.Illustrations(a) The question is, whether A and B were married.The fact that they were usually received and treated bytheir friends as husband and wife is relevant.(b) The question is, whether A was the legitimate son ofB.The fact that A was always treated as such by membersof the family is relevant.51. Whenever the opinion of any living person isrelevant the grounds on which such opinion is basedare also relevant.IllustrationAn expert may give an account of experiments performedby him for the purpose of forming his opinion.222EVIDENCE [Cap. 14CHARACTER WHEN RELEVANT52. In civil cases, the fact that the character of anyperson concerned is such as to render probable or improbable any conduct imputed to him is irrelevant,except in so far as such character appears from factsotherwise relevant.53. In criminal proceedings the fact that the personaccused is of a good character is relevant.54. In criminal proceedings the fact that theaccused person has a bad character is irrelevant,unless evidence has been given that he has a goodcharacter, in which case it becomes relevant.Explanation I.—This section does not apply to cases inwhich the bad character of any person is itself a fact inissue.Explanation 2.—A previous conviction is relevant asevidence of bad character in such case.55. In civil cases, the fact that the character of anyperson is such as to affect the amount of damageswhich he ought to receive is relevant.Explanation. —In sections 52, 53, 54, and 55 the word” character” includes both reputation and disposition ;but, except as provided in section 54, evidence may begiven only of general reputation and general disposition,and not of particular acts by which reputation or disposition were shown.In civil casescharacter toprove conductimputed,irrelevant.In criminalcases previousgood characterrelevant.Previous badcharacterirrelevant,except whenevidence ofgoodcharacter isgiven.Character asaffectingdamages.PART IION PROOFCHAPTER IIIFACTS WHICH NEED NOT BE PROVED56. No fact of which the court will take judicalnotice need be proved.57. The court shall take judicial notice of thefollowing facts:—(1) all laws, or rules having the force of law, nowor heretofore in force or hereafter to be inforce in any part of Sri Lanka;223No proofrequired offact judiciallynoticed.Facts ofwhich courtmust takejudicialnotice.Cap. 14] EVIDENCE(2) all public Acts passed or hereafter to be passedby Parliament, and all local and personal Actsdirected by Parliament to be judiciallynoticed; (3) articles of war for Sri Lanka Army, Sri Lanka Navy orSri Lanka Air Force ; *(4) the course of proceedings of Parliament and ofthe Legislature of Ceylon; Explanation.—The word “Parliament” in subsections (2)and (4) includes—(a) the Parliament of the United. Kingdom of GreatBritain and Northern Ireland;(b) the Parliament of Great Britain ;(c) the Parliament of England;(d) the Parliament of Scotland; and(e) the Parliament of Northern Ireland.†(5) the accession and the Sign Manual of theSovereigns for the time being of Ceylon andof the United Kingdom ; †(6) all seals of which English courts take judicialnotice ; the seals of all the courts of Ceylon ;the seals of Courts of Admiralty and maritime jurisdiction and of notaries public ; andall seals which any person is authorized touse by any Act of the Parliament of theUnited Kingdom or other law in force for thetime being in Ceylon;(7) the accession to office, names, titles, functions,and signatures of the persons filling for thetime being any public office in any part ofSri Lanka, if the fact of their appointment tosuch office is notified in the Gazette;(8) the existence, title, and national flag of everyState or Sovereign recognized bySri Lanka ;(9)[§7,3 of 1961.]the ordinary course of nature natural and artificialdivisions of time, the geographical divisions of theworld, the meaning of Sinhala, Tamil and English words,and public festivals, facts, and holidays notified inthe Gazette;* Paragraph (4) should be paraphrased to read “the course of proceedingof Paliament” and the explanation should be omitted at a statutoryreprint.† Paragraphs (5) and (6) should be omitted at a statutory reprint.224EVIDENCE [Cap. 14*(10) Her Majesty’s Realms and Territories ;(11) the commencement, continuance, and termination of hostilities between Sri Lanka andany State or body of persons;(12) the names of the members and officers of thecourt, and of their deputies and subordinateofficers and assistants, and also of all officersacting in execution of its process, and of allattorneys-at-law and other persons authorized by law to appear or act before it;(13) the rule of the road on land or at sea ;(14) all other matters which it is directed by anyenactment to notice.In all these cases, and also on all matters of publichistory, literature, science, or art, the court may resortfor its aid to appropriate books or documents ofreference.If the court is called upon by any person to takejudicial notice of any fact, it may refuse to do so unlessand until such person produces any such book ordocument as it may consider necessary to enable it todo so.58. No fact need be proved in any proceeding whichthe parties thereto or their agents agree to admit at thehearing, or which, before the hearing, they agree toadmit by any writing under their hands, or which byany rule of pleading in force at the time they aredeemed to have admitted by their pleadings :Provided that the court may, in its discretion, requirethe facts admitted to be proved otherwise than by suchadmissions.Facts admittedneed not beproved.CHAPTER IVOF ORAL EVIDENCE59. All facts, except the contents of documents, may Facts may bebe proved by oral evidence, oral evidance.* Paragraph (10) should be omitted at a statutory reprint.Cap. 14] EVIDENCEOral evidencemust bedirect. *60. Oral evidence must, in all cases whatever, bedirect; that is to say—(1) if it refers to a fact which could be seen it mustbe the evidence of a witness who says he sawthat fact;(2) if it refers to a fact which could be heard, it mustbe the evidence of a witness who says he heardthat fact;(3) if it refers to a fact which could be perceived byany other sense or in any other manner, it mustbe the evidence of a witness who says heperceived that fact by that sense or in thatmanner;(4) if it refers to an opinion or to the grounds onwhich that opinion is held, it must be theevidence of the person who holds that opinionon those grounds:Provided that the opinions of experts expressed inany treatise commonly offered for sale, and the groundson which such opinions are held, may be proved by theproduction of such treatises if the author is .dead orcannot be found, or has become incapable of givingevidence, or cannot be called as a witness without anamount of delay or expense which the court regards asunreasonable;Provided also that, if oral evidence refers to theexistence or condition of any material thing other thana document, the court may, if it thinks fit, require theproduction of such material thing for its inspection.Proof ofcontents ofdocuments.Primaryevidence.CHAPTER VOF DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE61. The contents of documents may be proved eitherby primary or by secondary evidence.62. Primary evidence means the document itselfproduced for the inspection of the court.* See in this connection Evidence (Special Provisions) Act, No 14 of 1995 whichprovided for the admissibility of Computer Evidence in civil or criminal matters.226EVIDENCE [Cap.14Explanation 1.—Where a document is executed in severalparts, each part is primary evidence of the document.Where a document is executed in counterpart, eachcounterpart being executed by one or some of the partiesonly, each counterpart is primary evidence as against theparties executing it.Explanation 2.—Where a number of documents are all madeby one uniform process, as in the case of printing, lithography, or photography, each is primary evidence ofthe contents of the rest; but where they are all copiesof a common original, they are not primary evidence ofthe contents of the original,IllustrationA person is shown to have been in possession of a numberof placards, all printed at one time from one original.Any one of the placards is primary evidence of thecontents of any other, but no one of them is primaryevidence of the contents of the original.63. Secondary evidence means and includes— Secondaryevidence.(1) certified copies given under the provisionshereinafter contained;(2) copies made from the original by mechanicalprocesses which in themselves insure theaccuracy of the copy, and copies comparedwith such copies;(3) copies made from or compared with the original;(4) counterparts of documents as against the partieswho did not execute them ;(5) oral accounts of the contents of a documentgiven by some person who has himself seen it.(a)(b)(c)(d)IllustrationsA photograph of an original is secondary evidence ofits contents, though the two have not been compared,if it is proved that the thing photographed was theoriginal.A copy compared with a copy of a letter made by acopying machine is secondary evidence of the contents of the letter, if it is shown that the copy madeby the copying machine was made from the original.A copy transcribed from a copy, but afterwards compared with the original, is secondary evidence; butthe copy not so compared is not secondary evidenceof the original, although the copy from which it wastranscribed was compared with the original.Neither an oral account of a copy compared with theoriginal nor an oral account of a photograph ormachine-copy of the original, is secondary evidenceof the original.227Cap. 14] EVIDENCEProof ofdocuments byprimaryevidence.Cases inwhich secondary evidencerelating todocumentsmay begiven.64. Documents must be proved by primary evidence,except in the cases hereinafter mentioned.65. Secondary evidence may be given of the existence, condition, or contents of a document in thefollowing cases:—(1) when the original is shown or appears to be inthe possession or power—(i) of the person against whom the documentis sought to be proved, or(ii) of any person out of reach of, or notsubject to, the process of the court, or(iii) of any person legally bound to produce it,and when, after the notice mentionedin section 66, such person does notproduce it ;(2) when the existence, condition, or contents of theoriginal have been proved to be admitted inwriting by the person against whom it issought to be proved, or by his representativein interest ;(3) when the original has been destroyed or lost, orwhen the party offering evidence of its contents cannot, for any other reason not arisingfrom his own default or neglect, produce it inreasonable time;(4) when the original is of such a nature as not tobe easily movable;(5) when the original is a public document withinthe meaning of section 74;(6) when the original is a document of which acertified’ copy is permitted by this Ordinanceor by any other law in force in Sri Lanka to begiven in evidence;(7) when the originals consist of numerous accountsor other documents which cannot convenientlybe examined in court, and the fact to be provedis the general result of the whole collection.228EVIDENCE [Cap. 14In cases (1), (3), and (4), any secondary evidenceof the contents of the document is admissible.In case (2), the written admission is admissible.In case (5) or (6), a certified copy of the document.but no other kind of secondary evidence, isadmissible.In case (7), evidence may be given as to the generalresult of the documents by any person who hasexamined them, and who is skilled in the examinationof such documents.66. Secondary evidence of the contents of the documents referred to in section 65, subsection (1), shallnot be given unless the party proposing to give suchsecondary evidence has previously given to the partyin whose possession or power the document is, or tohis attorney-at-law, such notice to produce it as is prescribed bylaw; and if no notice is prescribed by law, then such notice asthe court considers reasonable under the circumstances of thecase :Provided that such notice shall not be required inorder to render secondary evidence admissible in anyof the following cases, or in any other case in whichthe court thinks fit to dispense with it: —(1) when the document to be proved is itself anotice;(2) when from the nature of the case, the adverseparty must know that he will be required toproduce it;(3) when it appears or is proved that the adverseparty has obtained possession of the originalby fraud or by force ;(4) when the adverse party or his agent has theoriginal in court;(5) when that adverse party or his agent hasadmitted the loss of the document;(6) when the person in possession of the documentis out of reach of, or not subject to, theprocess of the court.229Rules as tonotice toproduce.Cap. 14] EVIDENCEProof ofsignature andhandwritingof personalleged tohave signedor writtendocumentproduced.Proof ofexecution ofdocumentrequired bylaw to beattested.Proof whereno attestingwitnessfound.Admission ofexecution byparty toattesteddocument.Proof whenattestingwitnessdenies theexecution.Proof ofdocument notrequired bylaw to beattested.Comparisonof handwritings.67. If a document is alleged to be signed or to havebeen written wholy or in part by any person, thesignature or the handwriting of so much of the document as is alleged to be in that person’s handwritingmust be proved to be in his handwriting.68. If a document is required by law to be attested,it shall not be used as evidence until one attestingwitness at least has been .called for the purpose ofproving its execution, if there be an attesting witnessalive, and subject to the process of the court andcapable of giving evidence.69. If no such attesting witness can be found, or ifthe document purports to have been executed inSri Lanka, it must be proved that the attestationof one attesting witness at least is in his handwriting,and that the signature of the person executing thedocument is in the handwriting of that person.70. The admission of a party to an attested document of its execution by himself shall be sufficient proofof its execution as against him, though it be a documentrequired by law to be attested.71. If the attesting witness denies or does notrecollect the execution of the document, its executionmay be proved by other evidence.72. An attested document not required by law to beattested may be proved as if it was unattested.73. (1) In order to ascertain whether a signature,writing, or seal is that of the person by whom it purports to have been written or made, any signature,writing, or seal admitted or proved to the satisfactionof the court to have been written or made by thatperson may be compared with the one which is to beproved, although that signature, writing, or seal hasnot been produced or proved for any other purpose.(2) The court may direct any person present in courtto write any words or figures for the purpose of enabling the court to compare the words or figures so writtenwith any words or figures alleged to have been writtenby such person.230EVIDENCE [Cap. 14(3) This section applies also, with any necessary [ § 3,1 of 1946.]modification, to finger impressions, palm impressionsand foot impressions.PUBLIC DOCUMENTS74. The following documents are public docu- Publicments:- documents.(a) documents forming the acts, or records of theacts—(i) of the President(ii) of official bodies and tribunals ; and(iii) of public officers legislative, judicial, andexecutive, whether of Sri Lanka, or of a foreigncountry;(b) public records, kept in Sri Lanka, of privatedocuments;(c) plans, surveys, or maps purporting to be signedby the Surveyor-General or officer acting onhis behalf.75. All other documents are private.76. Every public officer having the custody of apublic document, which any person has a right toinspect, shall give that person on demand a copy of iton payment of the legal fees therefor, together with acertificate written at the foot of such copy that it is atrue copy of such document or part thereof, as the casemay be, and such certificate shall be dated and subscribed by such officer with his name and his officialtitle, and shall be sealed, whenever such officer isauthorized by law to make use of a seal, and such copiesso certified shall be called certified copies.Explanation.—Any officer who, by the ordinary course ofofficial duty, is authorized to deliver such copies shall bedeemed to have the custody of such documents withinthe meaning of this section.231Privatedocuments.Certifiedcopies ofpublicdocuments.Cap. 14] EVIDENCEProof ofdocuments byproduction ofcertifiedcopies.Proof ofother officialdocuments.77. Such certified copies may be produced in proofof the contents of the public documents or parts of thepublic documents of which they purport to be copies.78. The following public documents may be provedas follows :—(1) acts, orders, or notifications of the Government of SriLanka or of any of its departments-(i) by the records of the departments certified by theheads of those departments respectively, or by theSecretary or a Additional Secretary or a SeniorAssistant Secretary or an Assistant Secretary ;(ii) by any document purporting to be printedby order of the Government;(2) the proceedings of Paliament_(i) by the minutes of that body, or(ii) by published enactments or abstracts, or(iii) by copies purporting to be printed byorder of Government;*(3) proclamations, orders, or regulations issued byHer Majesty or by the Privy Council, or byany department of Her Majesty’s Government—by copies or extracts contained in the LondonGazette or in the Gazette of Ceylon, orpurporting to be printed by the Queen’sprinter;(4) the acts of the executive or the proceedings ofthe legislature of a foreign country—(i) by journals published by their authority,or commonly received in that country assuch, or(ii) by a copy certified under the seal of thecountry or Sovereign, or(iii) by a recognition thereof in some public enactment of Sri Lanka;* Paragraph (3) should be omitted at a statutory reprint.EVIDENCE [Cap. 14(5) the proceedings of a municipal body in Sri Lanka-(i) by a copy of such proceedings certified bythe legal keeper thereof, or(ii) by a printed book purporting to be published by the authority of such body ;(6) public documents of any other class in a foreigncountry—(i) by the original, or(ii) by a copy certified by the legal keeper thereof,with a certificate under the seal of a notarypublic or of an Ambassador or High Commissioneror Diplomatic Agent, that the copy isduly certified by the officer having thelegal custody of the original and uponproof of the character of the documentaccording to the law of the foreigncountry.PRESUMPTIONS AS TO DOCUMENTS79. (1) The court shall presume every documentpurporting to be a certificate, certified copy, or otherdocument, which is by law declared to be admissibleas evidence of any particular fact, and which purportsto be duly certified by any officer in Sri Lanka, to begenuine:Provided that such document is substantially in theform and purports to be executed in the mannerdirected by law in that behalf.(2) The court shall also presume that any officer, bywhom any such document purports to be signed orcertified, held, when he signed it, the official characterwhich he claims in such paper.80. Whenever any document is produced before anycourt purporting to be a record or memorandum ofthe evidence or of any part of the evidence given bya witness in a judicial proceeding or before any officerauthorized by law to take such evidence, or to be astatement or confession by any prisoner or accused233Presumptionas togenuinenessof certifiedcopies.Presumptionon productionof record ofevidence.Cap. 14] EVIDENCEperson taken in accordance with law and purportingto be signed by any Judge or Magistrate or by anysuch officer as aforesaid, the court shall presume—(i) that the document is genuine;(ii) that any statements, as to the circumstances under which it was taken,purporting to be made by the personssigning it, are true; and(iii) that such evidence, statement, orconfession was duly taken. * 81. The court shall presume the genuineness of everydocument purporting to be the London Gazette orthe Gazette of Ceylon, or of any of Her Majesty’sRealms and Territories, or to be the Gazette issuedby the Local Government of any part of such Realmor Territory, or to be a newspaper or journal, or to bea copy of a private Act of the Parliament of the UnitedKingdom printed by the Queen’s printer, and of everydocument purporting to be a document directed by anylaw to be kept by any person, if such document iskept substantially in the form required by law and isPresumptionas to Gazettes.produced from proper custody. * 82. When any document is produced before anycourt purporting to be a document which, by the lawin force for the time being in England or NorthernIreland, would be admissible in proof of any particularin any Court of Justice in England or Northern Irelandwithout proof of the seal, or stamp, or signatureauthenticating it, or of the judicial or officialcharacter claimed by the person by whom it purportsto be signed, the court shall presume—Presumptionas todocumentadmissible inEnglandwithout proofof seal orsignature.(a) that such seal, stamp, or signature is genuine,and(b) that the person signing it held, at the timewhen he signed it, the judicial or officialcharacter which he claims,and the document shall be admissible for the samepurpose for which it would be admissible in Englandor Northern Ireland.* Sections 81 and 82 to be omitted at a statutory reprint as they have norelavance to Sri Lanka.EVIDENCE [Cap. 1483. The court shall presume that maps, plans, orsurveys purporting to be signed by the SurveyorGeneral or officer acting on his behalf were duly madeby his authority and are accurate; but maps, plans,or surveys not so signed must be proved to be accurate.84. The court shall presume the genuineness ofevery book purporting to be printed or published underthe authority of the Government of any country, andto contain any of the laws of that country, and of everybook purporting to contain reports of decisions of thecourts of such country.Presumptionas to maps orplans made orsigned bySurveyorGeneral.Presumptionas to collections of lawsand reportsof decisions.Presumption as topowers of attorney.Presumption as tocertified copies offoreign judicialrecords.Presumptionas to booksand maps.85. The court shall presume that every document purportingto be a power of attorney, and to have been executed before, andauthenticated by, a notary public, a person duly authorized bylaw in that behalf, or any court, Judge or Magistrate was soexecuted and authenticated.86. The court may presume that any document purportingto be a certified copy of any judicial record of any country isgenuine and accurate, if the document purports to be certified inany manner which is commonly in use in that country for thecertification of copies of judicial records.87. The court may presume that any book to whichit may refer for information on matters of public orgeneral interest, and that any published map or chart,the statements of which are relevant facts, and whichis produced for its inspection, was written and published by the person, and at the time and place bywhom or at which it purports to have been writtenor published.235Cap. 14] EVIDENCEPresumptionas to telegraphicmessages.88. The court may presume that a message, forwarded from a telegraph office to the person to whomsuch message purports to be addressed, correspondswith a message delivered for transmission at the officefrom which the message purports to be sent; but thecourt shall not make any presumption as to the personby whom such message was delivered for transmission.Presumptionas to dueexecution,&c., ofdocumentsnot produced.89. The court shall presume that every documentcalled for and not produced, after notice to producegiven under section 66, was attested, stamped, andexecuted in the manner required by law.Praeumptionas to document thirtyyears old.90. Where any document purporting or proved to bethirty years old is produced from any custody whichthe court in the particular case considers proper, thecourt may presume that the signature and every otherpart of such document which purports to be in thehandwriting of any particular person is in that person’shandwriting and in the case of a document executedor attested, that it was duly executed and attested bythe persons by whom it purports to be executed andattested.Explanation.—Documents are said to be in proper custody ifthey are in the place in which, and under the care of theperson with whom they would naturally be; but nocustody is improper if it is proved to have had a legitimate origin, or if the circumstances of the particular caseare such as to render such an origin probable.This explanation applies also to section 81.(a)IllustrationsA has been in possession of landed property for a longtime. He produces from his custody deeds relating tothe land showing his titles to it. The custody isproper.. produces deeds relating to landed property of whichhe is the mortgagee. The mortgagor is in possession.The custody is proper.(b) A(c) A. a connection of B, produces deeds relating to landsin B’a possession, which were deposited with him byB for safe custody. The custody is proper.236EVIDENCE [Cap. 14CHAPTER VIBANKERS BOOKS90A. In this Chapter, unless there is something Interpretation.repugnant in the subject or context—” bank ” and ” banker ” mean—(i) any company carrying on the business ofbankers,(ii) any partnership or individual to whose booksthe provisions of this Chapter shall have beenextended as hereinafter provided,(iii) any savings bank, post office savings bank, ormoney order office ;” bankers’ books ” include ledgers, day books, cashbooks, account books, and all other books usedin the ordinary business of a bank;” certified copy ” means a copy of any entry in thebooks of a bank, together with a certificatewritten at the foot of such copy that it is atrue copy of such entry; that such entry iscontained in one of the ordinary books of thebank, and was made in the usual and ordinarycourse of business ; and that such book is stillin the custody of the bank, such certificatebeing dated and subscribed by the principalaccountant or manager of the bank with hisname and official title.”company” means a company formed and registered under the Companies Act, No. 17 of 1982 or an existing company.90B. The Ministerl may from time to time, by notification in the Gazette, extend the provisions of thisChapter to the books of any partnership or individualcarrying on the business of bankers within Sri Lanka, andkeeping a set of not less than three ordinary account237Power toextendprovisions ofChapter.Cap. 14] EVIDENCEMode of proofof entries inbankers’books.Case in whichofficer ofbank notcompellableto producebooks.Inspection ofbooks byorder ofcourt orJudge.books, namely, a cash book, a day book or journal,and a ledger, and may in like manner rescind anysuch notification.90C. Subject to the provisions of this Chapter, acertified copy of any entry in a banker’s book shall inall legal proceedings be received as prima facie evidence of the existence of such entry, and shall beadmitted as evidence of the matters, transactions, andaccounts therein recorded in every case where, andto the same extent as the original entry itself is nowby law admissible, but not further or otherwise.90D. No officer of a bank shall, in any legal proceeding to which the bank is not a party, be compellableto produce any banker’s book the contents of whichcan be proved under this Chapter, or to appear as awitness to prove the matters, transactions, and accountstherein recorded, unless by order of the court, or aJudge, made for special cause.90E. (1) On the application of any party, to a legalproceeding, the court or a Judge may order that suchparty be at liberty to inspect and take copies of anyentries in a banker’s book for any of the purposes ofsuch proceeding, or may order the bank to prepareand produce, within a time to be specified in the order,certified copies of all such entries, accompanied by afurther certificate that no other entries are to be foundin the books of the bank relevant to the matters inissue in such proceeding, and such further certificateshall be dated and subscribed in manner herein beforedirected in reference to certified copies.(2) An order under this or the preceding sectionmay be made either with or without summoning thebank, and shall be served on the bank three clear days(exclusive of bank holidays) before the same is to beobeyed, unless the court or Judge shall otherwisedirect.(3) The bank may at any time, before the timelimited for obedience to any such order as aforesaid,either offer to produce their books at the trial or givenotice of their intention to show cause against suchorder, and thereupon the same shall not be enforcedwithout further order.238EVIDENCE [Cap. 1490F. (1) The costs of any application to the courtor a Judge under or for the purposes of this Chapter,and the costs of anything done or to be done underan order of the court or a Judge made under or forthe purposes of this Chapter, shall be in the discretionof the court or Judge, who may further order suchcosts or any part thereof to be paid to any party by thebank if they have been incurred in consequence of anyfault or improper delay on the part of the bank.(2) Any order made under this section for the payment of costs to or by a bank may be enforced as ifthe bank were a party to the proceeding.(3) Any order under this section awarding costsmay, on application to any court of civil judicaturedesignated in the order, be executed by such courtas if the order were a decree for money passed byitself :Provided that nothing in this subsection shall beconstrued to derogate from any power which thecourt or Judge making the order may possess for theenforcement of its or his directions with respect to thepayment of costs.Costs.CHAPTER VIIOF THE EXCLUSION OF ORAL BY DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE91. When the terms of a contract, or of a grant, orof any other disposition of property have been reducedby or by consent of the parties to the form of a document, and in all cases in which any matter is requiredby law to be reduced to the form of a document, noevidence shall be given in proof of the terms of suchcontract, grant, or other disposition of property, or ofsuch matter, except the document itself, or secondaryevidence of its contents in cases in which secondaryevidence is admissible under the provisions hereinbefore contained.Exception 1 .—When a public officer is required by law tobe appointed in writing, and when it is shown that anyparticular person has acted as such officer, the writingby which he is appointed need not be proved.Exception 2.—Wills admitted to probate in Sri Lanka may beproved by the probate.239Evidence ofterms ofcontracts,grants, orotherdisposition ofpropertyreduced toform ofdocument.Cap. 14] EVIDENCEExclusion ofevidence oforal agreement.Explanation 1—This section applies equally to cases inwhich the contracts, grants, or dispositions of propertyreferred to are contained in one document, and to casesin which they are contained in more documents thanone.Explanation 2.—Where there are more originals than one,one original only need be proved.Explanation 3.—The statement in any document whateverof a fact other than the facts referred to in this sectionshall not preclude the admission of oral evidence as tothe same fact.Illustrations(a) If a contract be contained in several latters, all theletters in which it is contained must be proved.(b) If a contract is contained in a bill of exchange, thebill of exchange must be proved.(c) If a bill of exchange is drawn in a set of three, one onlyneed be proved.(d) A contracts in writing with B for the delivery ofplumbago upon certain terms. The contract mentionsthe fact that B had paid A the price of otherplumbago contracted for verbally on anotheroccasion.Oral evidence is offered that no payment was made for theother plumbago. The evidence is admissible.(e) A gives B a receipt for money paid by B.Oral evidence is offered of the payment. The evidence isadmissible.92. When the terms of any such contract grant, orother disposition of property, or any matter requiredby law to be reduced to the form of a document, havebeen proved according to the last section, no evidenceof any oral agreement or statement shall be admittedas between the parties to any such instrument, or their representatives in interest, for the purpose of contradicting, varying, adding to, or subtracting from itsterms.Proviso (I). Any fact may be proved which wouldinvalidate any document, or which would entitle anyperson to any decree or order relating thereto, suchas fraud, intimidation, illegality, want of dueexecution, want of capacity in any contracting party,the fact that it is wrongly dated, want or failure ofconsideration, or mistake in fact or law.Proviso (2), The existence of any separate oralagreement as to any matter on which a document issilent, end which is not inconsistent with its terms,may be proved. In considering whether or not thisEVIDENCE [Cap.14proviso applies, the court shall have regard to thedegree of formality of the document.Proviso (3). The existence of any separate oralagreement constituting a condition precedent to theattaching of any obligation under any such contract,grant, or disposition of property may be proved.Proviso (4). The existence of any distinct subsequentoral agreement to rescind or modify any such contract,grant, or disposition of property may be proved, exceptin cases in which such contract, grant, or dispositionof property is by law required to be in writing, or hasbeen registered according to the law in force for thetime being as to the registration of documents.Proviso (5). Any usage or custom by which incidents,not expressly mentioned in any contract, are usuallyannexed to contracts of that description, may beproved:Provided that the annexing of such incident wouldnot be repugnant to, or inconsistent with, the expressterms of the contract.Proviso (6). Any fact may be proved whichshows in what manner the language of a document isrelated to existing facts.IllustrationsA policy of insurance is effected on goods “in shipsfrom Colombo to London”. The goods are shippedin a particular ship which is lost. The fact that thatparticular ship was orally excepted from the policycannot be proved.(a)(b) A agrees absolutely in writing to pay B Rs. 1,000 onthe 1st of March, 1896. The fact that, at the sametime, an oral agreement was made that money shouldnot be paid till the 31st of March cannot be proved,(c) An estate called the ” Rampore estate” is sold by adeed which contains a map of the property sold. Thefact that land not included in the map had alwaysbeen regarded as part of the estate and was meant topass by the deed cannot be proved.(d) A enters into a written contract with B to work certainmines, the property of B , upon certain terms. A wasinduced to do so by a misrepresentation of B’s as totheir value. This fact may be proved.(e) A institutes a suit against B for the specific performance of a contract, and also prays that the contractmay be reformed as to one of its provisions, on theground that that provision was inserted in it bymistake. A may prove that such a mistake was madeas would by law entitle him to have the contractreformed.241Cap. 14] EVIDENCEExclusion ofevidence toexplain oramendambiguousdocument.(f) A orders goods of B by a letter, in which nothing issaid as to the time of payment, and accepts the goodson delivery. B sues A for the price. A may showthat the goods were supplied on credit for a termstill unexpircd.(g) A sells B a horse and verbally warrants him sound.A gives B a paper in these words: ” Bought of A ahorse for Rs. 500″. B may prove the verbalwarranty.(h) A hires lodgings of B, and gives B a card on whichis written Rooms Rs. 200 a month”. A may provea verbal agreement that these terms were to includepartial board.A hires lodgings of B for a year, and a regularly stampedagreement drawn up by a notary is made betweenthem. It is silent on the subject of board. A maynot prove that board was included in the termsverbally.(i) A applies to B for a debt due to A by sending a receiptfor the money. B keeps the receipt and docs notsend the money. In a suit for the amount A mayprove this. (j) A and B made a contract in writing to take effect uponthe happening of a certain contingency. The writingis left with B, who sues A upon it. A may showthe circumstances under which it was delivered.93. When the language used in a document is on itsface ambiguous or defective, evidence may not begiven of facts which would show its meaning or supplyits defects.Illustrations(a) A agrees in writing to sell a horse to B for “Rs. 1,000or Rs. 1,500”. Evidence cannot be given to showwhich price was to be given.(b) A deed contains blanks. Evidence cannot be given of facts which would show how they were meantto be filled.Exclusion ofevidenceagainstapplication ofdocument toaxis tingfacts.94. When language used in a document is plain initself, and when it applies accurately to existing facts,evidence may not be given to show that it was notmeant to apply to such facts.IllustrationA sells to B by deed “My estate at Negombo containing100 acres “. A has an estate at Negombo containing 100acres. Evidence may not be given of the fact that theestate meant was one situated at a different place andof a different size.242EVIDENCE [Cap. 1495. When language used in a document is plain initself, but is unmeaning in reference to existing facts,evidence may be given to show that it was used in aparticular sense.IllustrationA sells to B by deed ” My house in Colombo “.A had no house in Colombo, but it appears that he had ahouse at Kotte, of which B had been in possession sincethe execution of the deed.These facts may be proved to show that the deed relatedto the house at Kotte.96. When the facts are such that the language usedmight have been meant to apply to any one, and couldnot have been meant to apply to more than one ofseveral persons or things, evidence may be given offacts which show which of those persons or things itwas intended to apply to.Illustrations(a) A agrees to sell to B for Rs. 1,000 ” My white horse”.A has two white horses. Evidence may be given of facts which show which of them was meant.(b) A agrees to accompany B to Halifax. Evidence maybe given of facts showing whether Halifax in Yorkshire or Halifax in Nova Scotia was meant.97. When the language used applies partly to oneset of existing facts and partly to another set ofexisting facts, but the whole of it does not applycorrectly to either, evidence may be given to show towhich of the two it was meant to apply.IllustrationA agrees to sell to B ” My land at X in the occupationof Y”. A has land at X, but not in the occupation of Y,and he has land in the occupation of Y, but it is notat X. Evidence may be given of facts showing which hemeant to sell.98. Evidence may be given to show the meaning ofillegible or not commonly intelligible characters, offoreign, obsolete, technical, local, and provincial expressions, of abbreviations, and of words used in apeculiar sense.IllustrationA, a sculptor, agrees to sell to B “All my mods”. A hasboth models and modelling tools. Evidence may be givento show which he meant to sell.243Evidence asto documentunmeaningin referenceto existingfacts.Evidence asto applicationof languagewhich canapply to oneonly ofseveralpersons.Evidence asto applicationof languageto one of twosets of facts,to neither ofwhich thewholecorrectlyapplies.Evidence asto meaning ofillegiblecharacters,&c.Cap. 14] EVIDENCEWho maygive evidenceof agreementvarying termsof document.99. Persons who are not parties to a document, or,their representatives in interest, may give evidence ofany facts tending to show a contemporaneous agreement, varying the terms of the document.IllustrationA and B make a contract in writing that B shall sell Acertain cotton, to be paid for on delivery. At the sametime they make an oral agreement that three months’credit shall be given to A. This could not be shown asbetween A and B, but it might be shown by C if itaffected his interests.Whatquestions tobe determinedaccording toEnglish Lawof Evidence.CHAPTER VIIIENGLISH LAW OF EVIDENCE WHEN IN FORCE100. Whenever in a judicial proceeding a questionof evidence arises not provided for by this Ordinanceor by any other law in force in Sri Lanka, such questionshall be determined in accordance with the EnglishLaw of Evidence for the time being.Burden ofproof.PART IIIPRODUCTION AND EFFECT OF EVIDENCECHAPTER IXOF THE BURDEN OF PROOF101. Whoever desires any court to give judgmentas to any legal right or liability dependent on theexistence of facts which he asserts, must prove thatthose facts exist.When a person is bound to prove the existence ofany fact, it is said that the burden of proof lies on thatperson.IllustrationsA desires a court to give judgment that B shall be(a) punished for a crime, which A says B has committed.A must prove that B has committed the crime.(b) A desires a court to give judgment that he is entitledto certain land in the possession of B by reason offacts which he asserts, and which B denies to be true.A must prove the existence of those facts.EVIDENCE [Cap. 14102. The burden of proof in a suit or proceeding On whomlies on that person who would fail if no evidence at all burden ofwere given on either side.Illustrations(a) A sues B for land of which B is in possession, andwhich, as A asserts, was left to A by the will of C,B’s father.If no evidence were given on either side, B would beentitled to retain his possession. Therefore theburden of proof is on A.(b) A sues B for money due on a bond.The execution of the bond is admitted, but B says that itwas obtained by fraud, which A denies.If no evidence were given on either side, A would succeed,as the bond is not disputed and the fraud is notproved. Therefore the burden of proof is on B.103. The burden of proof as to any particular factlies on that person who wishes the court to believe inits existence, unless it is provided by any law that theproof of that fact shall lie on any particular person.Burden ofproof as toparticularfact.IllustrationA prosecutes B for theft, and wishes the court to believethat B admitted the theft to C. A . must prove theadmission.B wishes the court to believe that, at the time in question,he was elsewhere. He must prove it.104. The burden of proving any fact necessary tobe proved in order to enable any person to giveevidence of any other fact is on the person who wishesto give such evidence.Burden ofproving factnecessary tobe proved tomakeevidenceadmissible.Illustrations(a) A wishes to prove a dying declaration by B. A mustprove B’s death.(b) A wishes to prove, by secondary evidence, the contentsof a lost document.A must prove that the document has been lost.105. When a person is accused of any offence, theburden of proving the existence of circumstancesbringing the case within any of the general exceptionsin the Penal Code, or within any special exception orproviso contained in any other part of the same Code,245Burden ofproving thatcase ofaccusedcomes withinexceptions.Cap. 14] EVIDENCEBurden ofproving factespeciallywithinknowledge ofany person.Burden ofproving deathof personknown tohave beenalive withinthirty years.Burden ofproving thatperson isalive who hasnot beenheard offor oneyear.[§ 2,10 of 1988]Burden ofproof as topartnership,tenancy,andagency.or in any law defining the offence, is upon him, andthe court shall presume the absence of such circumstances.Illustrations(a) A, accused of murder, alleges that, by reason ofunsoundness of mind, he did not know the natureof the act.The burden of the proof is on A.(b) A, accused of murder, alleges that, by grave andsudden provocation, he was deprived of the powerof self-control.The burden of proof is on A.(c) Section 316 of the Penal Code provides that whoever,except in the case provided for by section 326, voluntarily causes grievous hurt shall be subject to certainpunishments.A is charged with voluntarily causing grievous hurt undersection 316.The burden of proving the circumstances bringing the caseunder section 326 lies on A.106. When any fact is especially within the knowledge of any person, the burden of proving that factis upon him.Illustrations(a) When a person does an act with some intention otherthan that which the character and circumstances ofthe act suggest, the burden of proving that intentionis upon him.(b) A is charged with travelling on a railway without aticket. The burden of proving that he had a ticket is on him.107. When the question is whether a man is aliveor dead, and it is shown that he was alive withinthirty years, the burden of proving that he is dead ison the person who affirms it.108. Provided that when the question is whether aman is alive or dead, and it is proved that he has notbeen heard of for one year by those who wouldnaturally have heard of him if he had been alive, theburden of proving that he is alive is shifted to theperson who affirms it.109. When the question is whether persons arepartners, landlord and tenant, or principal and agent,and it has been shown that they have been acting assuch, the burden of proving that they do not stand, or246EVIDENCE [Cap. 14have ceased to stand, to each other in those relationships respectively is on the person who affirms it.110. When the question is whether any person isowner of anything of which he is shown to be inpossession, the burden of proving that he is not theowner is on the person who affirms that he is not theowner.111. Where there is a question as to the good faithof a transaction between parties, one of whom standsto the other in a position of active confidence, theburden of proving the good faith of the transactionis on the party who is in a position of activeconfidence.Ilustrations(a) The good faith of a sale by a client to an attorney-at-law is inquestion in a suit brought by the client. The burdenof proving the good faith of the transaction is on theattorney-at-law.(b) The good faith of a sale by a son just come of age to afather is in question in a suit brought by the son. The burden of proving the good faith of the transaction is on the father.112. The fact that any person was born during thecontinuance of a valid marriage between his motherand any man, or within two hundred and eighty daysafter its dissolution, the mother remaining unmarried,shall be conclusive proof that such person is thelegitimate son of that man, unless it can be shown thatthat man had no access to the mother at any timewhen such person could have been begotten or thathe was impotent.113. It shall be an irrebuttable presumption of thelaw that a boy under the age of twelve years isincapable of committing rape.114. The court may presume the existence of anyfact which it thinks likely to have happened, regardbeing had to the common course of natural events,human conduct, and public and private business intheir relation to the facts of the particular case.247Burden ofproof as toownership.Proof of goodfaith in transactions whereone partyis in positionof activeconfidence.Birth duringmarriage conclusive proofof legitimacy.Presumptionthat a boyunder twelveyears cannotcommit rape.Court maypresumeexistence ofcertain facts.Cap. 14] EVIDENCEIllustrationsThe court may presume—(a) that a man who is in possession of stolen goods soonafter the theft is either the thief or has received thegoods knowing them to be stolen, unless he canaccount for his possession ;(b) that an accomplice is unworthy of credit, unless he iscorroborated in material particulars ;(c) that a thing or state of things which has been shownto be in existence within a period shorter than thatwithin which such thing or state of things usuallyceases to exist is still in existence;(d) that judicial and official acts have been regularlyperformed ;(e) that the common course of business has been followedin particular cases;(f) that evidence which could be and is not producedwould if produced, be unfavourable to the personwho withholds it ;(g) that if a man refuses to answer a question which he isnot compelled to answer by law, the answer, ifgiven, would be unfavourable to him;(h) that when a document creating an obligation is in thehands of the obligor, the obligation has beendischarged.But the court shall also have regard to such facts as thefollowing in considering whether such maxims do or do notapply to the particular case before it: —as to illustration (a)—a shopkeeper has in his till amarked rupee soon after it was stolen, and cannotaccount for its possession specifically, but iscontinually receiving rupees in the course of hisbusiness.as to illustration (b)—A, a person of the highest character,is tried for causing a man’s death by an act ofnegligence in arranging certain machinery. B, aperson of equally good character, who also took partin the arrangement, describes precisely what wasdone, and admits and explains the commoh carelessness of A and himself.as to illustration (b)—a crime is committed by severalpersons. A, B, and C, three of the criminals, arecaptured on the spot and kept apart from each other.Each gives an account of the crime implicating D,and the accounts corroborate each other in such amanner as to render previous concert highlyimprobable.as to illustration (c)—it is proved that a river ran in acertain course five years ago, but it is known thatthere have been floods since that time which mightchange its course.as to illustration (d)—a judicial act, the regularity ofwhich is in question, was performed under exceptional circumstances.as to illustration (e)—the question is, whether a letterwas received. It is shown to have been posted, butthe usual course of the post was interrupted bydisturbances.248EVIDENCE [Cap. 14as to illustration (f)—a man refuses to produce a document which would bear on a contract of smallimportance on which he is sued, but which mightalso injure the feelings and reputation of his family.as to illustration (g)—a man refuses to answer a questionwhich he is not compelled by law to answer, butthe answer to it might cause loss to him in mattersunconnected .with the matter in relation to which itis asked.as to illustration (h)—a bond is in possession of the obligor,but the circumstances of the case are such that hemay have stolen it.CHAPTER XESTOPPEL115. When one person has by his declaration, act,or omission intentionally caused or permitted anotherperson to believe a thing to be true and to act uponsuch belief, neither he nor his representative shall beallowed in any suit or proceeding between himself andsuch person or his representative to deny the truthof that thing.IllustrationA intentionally and falsely leads B to believe that a certainland belongs to A, and thereby induces B to buy andpay for it.The land afterwards becomes the property of A, and Aseeks to set aside the sale, on the ground that at the timeof the sale he bad no title. He must not be, allowed toprove his want of title.116. No tenant of immovable property, or personclaiming through such tenant, shall during the continuance of the tenancy, be permitted to deny that thelandlord of such tenant had, at the beginning of thetenancy, a title to such immovable property ; andno person who came upon any immovable propertyby the licence of the person in possession thereof shallbe permitted to deny that such person had a title tosuch possession at the time when such licence wasgiven.117. No bailee, agent, or licensee shall be permittedto deny that the bailor, principal, or licensor, by whomany goods were entrusted to any of them respectively,was entitled to those goods at the time when they wereso entrusted:249Estoppel.Estoppel oftenant;and oflicensee ofparson inpossession.Estoppel ofbailee, &c.Cap. 14] EVIDENCEProvided that any such bailee, agent, or licensee mayshow that he was compelled to deliver up any suchgoods to some person who had a right to them asagainst his bailor, principal, or licensor, or that hisbailor, principal, or licensor wrongfully, and withoutnotice to the bailee, agent, or licensee, obtained thegoods from a third person, who has claimed them fromsuch bailee, agent, or licensee.Who maytestify.Dumbwitnesses.Competentwitnesses.CHAPTER XIOF WITNESSES118. All persons shall be competent to testify unlessthe court considers that they are prevented from understanding the questions put to them, or from givingrational answers to those questions, by tender years,extreme old age, disease, whether of body or mind,or any other cause of the same kind.Explanation.—A person of unsound mind is not incompetentto testify unless he is prevented by his unsoundness ofmind from understanding the questions put to him andgiving rational answers to them.119. A witness who is unable to speak may give hisevidence in any other manner in which he can makeit intelligible, as by writing or by signs; but suchwriting must be written and the signs made in opencourt. Evidence so given shall be deemed to be oralevidence.120. (1) In all civil proceedings the parties to thesuit and the husband or wife of any party to the suitshall be competent witnesses.(2) In criminal proceedings against any person thehusband or wife of such person respectively shall be a competent witness if called by the accused, but inthat case all communications between them shall ceaseto be privileged. (3) In criminal proceedings against a husband orwife for any bodily injury or violence inflicted on hisor her wife or husband, sueh wife or husband shallbe a competent and compellable witness.250EVIDENCE [Cap. 14(4) In criminal proceedings against a husband orwife for any attempt to cause any bodily injury orviolence on his or her wife or husband, such wife orhusband shall be a competent witness for the prosecution.(5) In criminal proceedings against a husband orwife for an offence punishable under section 362B or362c of the Penal Code, the wife or husband of theaccused shall be a competent witness for the prosecution.(6) In criminal trials the accused shall be acompetent witness in his own behalf, and may giveevidence in the same manner and with the like effectand consequences as any other witness, provided that,so far as the cross-examination relates to the credit ofthe accused, the court may limit the cross-examinationto such extent as it thinks proper, although theproposed cross-examination might be permissible inthe case of any other witness.121. No Judge or Magistrate shall, except uponspecial order of a Judge of a superior court, be compelled to answer any questions as to his own conductin court as such Judge or Magistrate, or as to anythingwhich came to his knowledge in court as such Judgeor Magistrate; but he may be examined as to othermatters which occurred in his presence while he wasso acting.Illustration(a) A, on his trial before tha High Court says that adeposition was improperly taken by B, the Magistrate.B cannot be compelled to answer questions as to this,except upon the special order of the Judge.(b) A is accused before the District Court of having givenfalse evidence before B, a Magistrate. B cannot beasked what A said, except upon the special order ofthe District Judge.(c) A is accused before the High Court of attemptingto murder a police officer whilst on his trial beforeB, a District Judge. B may be examined as to whatoccurred.122. No person who is or has been married shallbe compelled to disclose any communication made tohim during marriage by any person to whom he isor has been married, nor shall he be permitted todisclose any such communication unless the person who251Judges andMagistrates.Communications duringmarriage.Cap. 14] EVIDENCEEvidence asto affairs ofState.Official cornmunicationsInformationas to commission ofoffences.Professsionaloommunications.made it, or his representative in interest, consents,except in suits between married persons, or proceedings in which one married person is prosecuted for anycrime committed against the other, and except in casesmentioned in section 120 (2).123. No one shall be permitted to produce anyunpublished official records relating to any affairs ofState, or to give any evidence derived therefrom, exceptwith the permission of the officer at the head of thedepartment concerned, who shall give or withhold suchpermission as he thinks fit, subject, however, to thecontrol of the Minister.124. No public officer shall be compelled to disclosecommunications made to him in official confidencewhen he considers that the public interests wouldsuffer by the disclosure.125. No Magistrate or police officer shall be compelled to say whence he got the information as to thecommission of any offence, and no revenue officer shallbe compelled to say whence he got any information asto the commission of any offence against the publicrevenue or the excise laws.Explanations—” Revenue officer ” in this section means anyofficer emolyed in or about the business of any branchof the public revenue, or in or about the business ofany Government farm.126. (1) No attorney-at-law or notary shall atany time be permitted, unless with his client’s expressconsent, to disclose any communication made to himin the course and for the purpose of his employment assuch attorney-at-law, or notary by or on behalf of hisclient, or to state the contents or conditions of anydocument with which he has become acquainted in thecourse and for the purpose of his professional employment, or to disclose any advice given by him to hisclient in the course of and for the purpose of suchemployment :Provided that nothing in this section shall protectfrom disclosure(a) any such communication made in furtherance ofany illegal purpose ;252EVIDENCE [Cap. 14(b) any fact observed by any attorney-at-law, ornotary in the course of his employment as such,showing that any crime or fraud has beencommitted since the commencement of hisemployment.(2) It is immaterial whether the attention of suchattorney-at-law , or notary was or was not directed tosuch fact by or on behalf of his client.Explanation:- The obligation stated in this section continuesafter the employment has ceased.Illustrations (a) A, a client, says to B, a attomey-at-law, “I have committed forgery, and Iwish you to defend me”.As the defence of a man known to be guilty is not acriminal purpose, this communication is protectedfrom disclousre.(b) A, a client, says to B, an attorney-at-law, “I wish to obtainpossession of property by the use of a forged deed,on which I request you to sue”.This communication, being made in furtherance of acriminal purpose, is not protected from disclosure.(c) A, being charged with embezzlement, retains B, anattorney-at-law to defend him. In the course of theproceedings B observes that an entry has been madein A’s account book charging A with the sum said tohave been embezzled, which entry was not in thebook at the commencement of his employment.This being a fact observed by B in the course of hisemployment, showing that a fraud has beencommitted since the commencement of theproceedings, it is not protected from disclosure.127. The provisions of section 126 shall apply tointerpreters and the clerks or servants of attorneysat-law, and notaries.128. If any party to a suit gives evidence therein athis own instance or otherwise, he shall not be deemedto have consented thereby to such disclosure as ismentioned in section 126, and if any party to a suit orproceeding calls any such attorney-at-law, or notaryas a witness, he shall be deemed to have consented tosuch disclosure only if he questions such attorneyat-law, or notary on matters which but for suchquestions, he would not be at liberty to disclose.253Section 126to apply toclerks andservants ofattorneys-at-law andnotaries.Privilege notwaived byvoluntearingevidence.Cap. 14] EVIDENCEConfidentialcommunica- tions withlegal advisers.Production ofwitness’s titledeeds.By a party tothe suit.Bankers’books.Who may notbe compelledto producedocuments.129. No one shall be compelled to disclose to thecourt any confidential communication which has takenplace between him and his legal professional adviser,unless he offers himself as a witness, in which case hemay be compelled to disclose any such communicationsas may appear to the court necessary to be known inorder to explain any evidence which he has given, butno others.130. (1) No witness who is not party to a suit shallbe compelled to produce his title deeds to any property,or any document in virtue of which he holds anyproperty as pledgee or mortgagee, or any document theproduction of which might tend to criminate him,unless he has agreed in writing to produce them withthe person seeking the production of such deeds orsome person through whom he claims.(2) No witness who is a party to the suit shall bebound to produce any document in his possession orpower which is not relevant or material to the case ofthe party requiring its production.(3) No bank shall be compelled to produce the booksof such bank in any legal proceeding to which suchbank is not a party, except as provided by section 90D.131. No one shall be compelled to produce documents in his possession which any other person wouldbe entitled to refuse to produce if they were in hispossession (except for the purpose of identification),unless such last-mentioned person consents to theirproduction, nor shall any one who is entitled to refuseto produce a document be compelled to give oralevidence of its contents.Witness notexcused fromanswering onground thatanswer willcriminate.132. (1) A witness shall not be excused fromanswering any question as to any matter relevant tothe matter in issue in any suit or in any civil orcriminal proceeding upon the ground that the answerto such question will criminate or may tend directly orindirectly to criminate such witness, or that it willexpose or tend directly or indirectly to expose suchwitness to a penalty or forfeiture of any kind, or thatit will establish or tend to establish that he owes a debt,254EVIDENCE [Cap. 14or is otherwise subject to a civil suit.(2) No answer which a witness shall be compelled bythe court to give shall subject him to any arrest orprosecution, or be proved against him in any criminalproceeding, except a prosecution for giving falseevidence by such answer.(3) Before compelling a witness to answer a question the answer to which will criminate or may tenddirectly or indirectly to criminate such witness, thecourt shall explain to the witness the purport of thelast preceding subsection.133. An accomplice shall be a competent witnessagainst an accused person, and a conviction is notillegal merely because it proceeds upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice.134. No particular number of witnesses shall in anycase be required for the proof of any fact.Not liable forprosecutionfor suchanswer.Court shallexplainsubsection(2).Accomplice.Number ofwitnesses.CHAPTER XIIOF THE EXAMINATION OF WITNESSES135. The order in which witnesses are produced andexamined shall be regulated by the law and practicefor the time being relating to civil and criminal procedure respectively and, in the absence of any such law,by the discretion of the court.136. (1) When either party proposes to give evidence of any fact, the Judge may ask the party proposingto give the evidence in what manner the alleged fact,if proved, would be relevant; and the Judge shalladmit the evidence if he thinks that the fact, if proved,would be relevant, and not otherwise.(2) If the fact proposed to be proved is one of whichevidence is admissible only upon proof of some otherfact, such last-mentioned fact must be proved beforeevidence is given of the fact first mentioned, unless theparty undertakes to give proof of such fact, and thecourt is satisfied with such undertaking.255Order ofproductionand examination ofwitnesses.Judge todecide as toadmissibilityof evidence.Cap. 14] EVIDENCE(3) If the relevancy of one alleged fact depends uponanother alleged fact being first proved, the Judge mayin his discretion either permit evidence of the firstfact to be given before the second fact is proved, orrequire evidence to be given of the second fact beforeevidence is given of the first fact.Examinationin-chief.Crossexamination.Re-examination. Illustrations(a) It is proposed to prove a statement about a relevantfact by a person alleged to be dead, which statementis relevant under section 32.The fact that the person is dead must be proved by theperson proposing to prove the, statement beforeevidence is given of the statement.(b) It is proposed to prove by a copy the contents of adocument said to be lost.The fact that the original is lost must be proved by theperson proposing to produce the copy before thecopy is produced.(c) A is accused of receiving stolen property knowing itto have been stolen.It is proposed to prove that he denied the possession of theproperty.The relevancy of the denial depends on the identity ofthe property. The court may in its discretion eitherrequire the property to be identified before thedenial of the possession is proved, or permit thedenial of the possession to be proved before theproperty is identified.(d) It is proposed to prove a fact (a) which is said to havebeen the cause or effect of a fact in issue. There areseveral intermediate facts, (b) , (c), and (d), whichmust be shown to exist before the fact (a) can beregarded as the cause or effect of the fact in issue.The court may either permit (a) to be proved before(b), (c) or (d) is proved, or may require proofof (b), (c), and (d) before permitting proof of (a).137. (1) The examination of a witness by the partywho calls him shall be called his examuiation-in-chief.(2) The examination of a witness by the adverseparty shall be called his cross-examination.(3) The examination of a witness subsequent to thecross-examination by the party who called him, shallbe called his re-examination.Order of l38. (1) Witnesses shall be first examined-in-chief,examinations then (if the adverse party so desires) cross-examined,then (if the party calling him so desires) re-examined.256EVIDENCE [Cap. 14(2) The examination and cross-examination mustrelate to relevant facts, but the cross-examination neednot be confined to the facts to which the witness testified on his examination-in-chief.(3) The re-examination shall be directed to theexplanation of matters referred to in cross-examinationand if new matter is, by permission of the court, introduced in re-examination, the adverse party mayfurther cross-examine upon that matter.(4) The court may in all cases permit a witness tobe recalled either for further examination-in-chief orfor further cross-examination, and if it does so theparties have the right of further cross-examination andre-examination respectively.Examinationand crossexamination.Re-examination.Furtherexaminationand crossexamination.139. A person summoned to produce a documentdoes not become a witness by the mere fact that heproduces it, and cannot be cross-examined unless anduntil he is called as a witness.140. Witnesses to character may be cross-examinedand re-examined.141. Any question suggesting the answer which theperson putting it wishes or expects to receive is calleda leading question.142. Leading questions must not, if objected to bythe adverse party, be asked in an examination-in-chiefor in a re-examination, except with the permission ofthe court.143. (1) Leading questions may be asked in crossexamination, subject to the following qualifications :—(a) the question must not put into the mouth ofthe witness the very words which he is toecho back again ; and(b) the question must not assume that facts havebeen proved which have not been proved, orthat particular answers have been given contrary to the fact.257Crossexaminationof personcalled toproduce adocument.Witnesses tocharacter.Leadingquestions.When leadingquestionsmust not beasked.When leadingquestions maybe asked incrossexamination.Cap. 14] EVIDENCECourt mayprohibitleadingquestions.Evidence asto matters inwriting.(2) The court in its discretion may prohibit leadingquestions from being put to a witness who shows astrong interest or bias in favour of the cross-examining party.144. Any witness may be asked, whilst underexamination whether any contract, grant, or other disposition of property as to which he is giving evidence,was not contained in a document, and if he says thatit was, or if he is about to make any statement as tothe contents of any document which, in the opinionof the court, ought to be produced, the adverse partymay object to such evidence being given until suchdocument is produced, or until facts have been provedwhich entitle the party who called the witness to givesecondary evidence of it.Explanation.—A witness may give oral evidence of statements made by other persons about, the contents ofdocuments if such statements are in themselves relevantfacts.Crossexaminationas to previousstatements inwriting.As to proof ofpreviousstatement.IllustrationThe question is whether A assaulted B. C. deposes that heheard A say to D, ” B wrote a letter accusing me oftheft, and I will be revenged on him”. This statementis relevant as showing A’s motive for the assault, andevidence may be given of it, though no other evidenceis given about the letter.145. (1) A witness may be cross-examined as toprevious statements made by him in writing or reducedinto writing and relevant to matters in question without such writing being shown to him, or being proved;but if it is intended to contradict him by the writing,his attention must, before the writing can be proved,be called to those parts of it which are to be usedfor the purpose of contradicting him.(2) If a witness, upon cross-examination as to aprevious oral statement made by him relevant tomatters in question in the suit or proceeding in whichhe is cross-examined and inconsistence with his presenttestimony, does not distinctly admit that he made suchstatement, proof may be given that he did in fact makeit; but before such proof can be given the circumstancesof the supposed statement sufficient to designate the258EVIDENCE [Cap. 14particular occasion must be mentioned to the witness,and he must be asked whether or not he made sucha statement.146. When a witness is cross-examined, he may, inaddition to the questions herein before referred to, beasked any questions which tend—(a) to test his accuracy, veracity, or credibility;(b) to discover who he is, and what is his positionin life; or(c) to shake his credit, by injuring his character;although the answer to such questions might tenddirectly or indirectly to criminate him, or mightexpose or tend directly or indirectly to expose him toa penalty or forfeiture.Questionslawful incrossexam ination.147. If any such question relates to a matter relevant When witnessto the suit or proceeding, the provisions of section 132 to beshall apply thereto, compelled148. (1) If any such question relates to a matter notrelevant to the suit or proceeding, except in so far asit affects the credit of the witness by injuring hischaracter, the court shall decide whether or not thewitness shall be compelled to answer it, and may, if itthinks fit, warn the witness that he is not obliged toanswer it.(2) In exercising its discretion, the court shall haveregard to the following considerations :-(a) such questions are proper if they are of such anature that the truth of the imputation conveyed by them would seriously affect theopinion of the court as to the credibility of thewitness on the matter to which he testifies ;(b) such questions are improper if the imputationwhich they convey relates to matters so remotein time, or of such a character that the truthof the imputation would not affect, or wouldaffect in a slight degree, the opinion of thecourt as to the credibility of the witness onthe matter to which he testifies ;259Court todecide whenwitness shallbe compelledto answer.Cap. 14] EVIDENCEQuestion notto be askedwithoutreasonablegrounds.(c) such questions are improper if there is a greatdisproportion between the importance of theimputation made against the witness’scharacter and the importance of his evidence ;(d) the court may, if it sees fit, draw from thewitness’s refusal to answer the inference thatthe answer if given would be unfavourable.149. No such question as is referred to in section 148ought to be asked unless the person asking it hasreasonable grounds for thinking that the imputationwhich it conveys is well founded.Illustrations(a)(b)An attorney-at-law is instructed that an important witness is a thief. Thisis a reasonable ground for asking the witness whether he is a thief.An attorney-at-law is informed by a person in court that an importantwitness is a professional gambler. The informant, on being questionedby the attomey-at-law, gives satisfactory reasons for his statement. Thisis a reasonable ground for asking the witness whether he is a professionalgambler.Procedure ofcourt in caseof questionbeing askedwithoutreasonablegrounds.(c) A witness, of whom nothing whatever is known, isasked at random whether he is a thief. There arehere no reasonable grounds for the question.(d) A witness of whom nothing whatever is known,being questioned as to his mode of life and meansof living, gives unsatisfactory answers. This maybe a reasonable ground for asking if he is aprofessional gambler.150. If the court is of opinion that any such questionwas asked without reasonable grounds, it may, if itwas asked by any attorney-at-law, report thecircumstances of the case to the Supreme Court orother authority to which such attorney-at-law issubject in the exercise of his profession.Indecent andscandalousquestions.151. The court may forbid any questions or inquirieswhich it regards as indecent or scandalous, althoughsuch questions or inquiries may have some bearing onthe questions before the court, unless they relate tofacts in issue, or to matters necessary to be known inorder to determine whether or not the facts in issueexisted.260EVIDENCE [Cap. 14152. The court shall forbid any question whichappears to it to be intended to insult or annoy, orwhich, though proper in itself, appears to the courtneedlessly offensive in form.153. When a witness has been asked and has answered any question which is relevant to the inquiryonly in so far as it tends to shake his credit by injuringhis character, no evidence shall be given to contradicthim ; but if he answers falsely, he may afterwards becharged with giving false evidence.Exception 1.—If a witness is asked whether he has beenpreviously convicted of any crime and denies it, evidencemay be given of his previous conviction.Exception 2.—If a witness is asked any question tending toimpeach his impartiality, and answers it by denying thefact suggested, he may be contradicted.Illustrations(a) A claim against an underwriter is resisted on theground of fraud.The claimant is asked whether, in a former transaction,he had not made a fraudulent claim. He denies itEvidence is offered to show that he did make such a claim.The evidence is inadmissible.(b) A witness is asked whether he was not dismissedfrom a situation for dishonesty. He denies it.Evidence is offered to show that he was dismissed fordishonesty.The evidence is not admissible.(c) A affirms that on a certain day he saw B at Jaffna.A is asked whether he himself was not on that day atColombo. He denies it.Evidence is offered to show that A was on that date atColombo.The evidence is admissible, not as contradicting A on afact which affects his credit, but as contradictingthe alleged fact that B was seen on the day inquestion in Jaflna.In each of these cases the witness might, if his denial wasfalse, be charged with giving false evidence.(d) A is tried tor a rape on B. B is asked in crossexamination whether she has not had illicitintercourse with C and D. She denies it. Evidenceis offered to show that she has had such intercoursewith C and D. The evidence is not admissible.(e) A is asked whether he has not said that he would berevenged on B, against whom he gives evidence. Hedenies it. He may be contradicted on the groundthat the question tends to impeach his impartiality.261Questionsintended toinsult orannoy.Exclusion ofevidence tocontradictanswers toquestionstestingveracity.Cap. 14] EVIDENCEQuestion byparty to hisown witness.Impeachingcredit ofwitness.Questionstending tocorroborateevidence ofrelevant factadmissible.154. The court may in its discretion permit theperson who calls a witness to put any question to himwhich might be put in cross-examination by theadverse party.155. The credit of a witness may be impeached inthe following ways by the adverse party or, with theconsent of the court, by the party who calls him :—(a) by the evidence of persons who testify that they,from their knowledge of the witness, believehim to be unworthy of credit;(b) by proof that the witness has been bribed or hasaccepted the offer of a bribe, or has receivedany other corrupt inducement to give hisevidence;(c) by proof of former statements inconsistent withany part of his evidence which is liable to becontradicted;(d) when a man is prosecuted for rape or an attemptto ravish, it may be shown that the prosecutrixwas of generally immoral character.Explanation.—A witness declaring another witness to beunworthy of credit may not, upon his examination-inchief, give reasons for his belief, but he may be askedhis reasons in cross-examination, and the answerswhich he gives cannot be contradicted, though, if theyare false, he may afterwards be charged with givingfalse evidence.Illustrations(a) A sues B for the price of goods sold and delivered to B.C says that he delivered the goods to B.Evidence is offered to show that, on a previous occasion,he said that he had not delivered the goods to B.The evidence is admissible.(b) A is indicted for the murder of B.C says that B, when dying, declared that A had given Bthe wound of which he died.Evidence is offered to show that, on a previous occasion,C said that the wound was not given by A or in hispresence.The evidence is admissible.156. When a witness whom it is intended to corroborate gives evidence of any relevant fact, he may bequestioned as to any other circumstances which heobserved at or near to the time or place at which such262EVIDENCE [Cap. 1 4relevant fact occurred, if the court is of opinion thatsuch circumstances, if proved, would corroborate thetestimony of the witness as to the relevant fact whichhe testifies.IllustrationA, an accomplice, gives an account of a robbery in whichhe took part. He describes various incidents unconnectedwith the robbery which occurred on his way to andfrom the place where it was committed.Independent evidance of these facts may be given in orderto corroborate his evidence as to the robbery itself.157. In order to corroborate the testimony of a witness, any former statement made by such witness,whether written or verbal, relating to the same factat or about the time when the fact took place or beforeany authority legally competent to investigate the fact,may be proved.158. Whenever any statement relevant under section32 or 33 is proved, all matters may be proved eitherin order to contradict or to corroborate it, or in orderto impeach or confirm the credit of the person by whomit was made, which might have been proved if thatperson had been called as a witness and had deniedupon cross-examination the truth of the mattersuggested.159. (1) A witness may, while under examination,refresh his memory by referring to any writing madeby himself at the time of the transaction concerningwhich he is questioned or so soon afterwards that thecourt considers it likely that the transaction was atthat time fresh in his memory.(2) The witness may also refer to any such writingmade by any other person, and read by .the witnesswithin the time aforesaid, if when he read it he knewit to be correct.(3) Whenever a witness may refresh his memoryby reference to any document, he may, with the permission of the court, refer to a copy of such document:Provided the court be satisfied that there is sufficientreason for the non-production of the original.263Formerstatement ofwitness maybe proved tocorroboratelater testimony as tosame facts.What mattersmay beproved inconnectionwith provedstatementrelevantundersection 32or 33.Refreshingmemory.By writingmade byanother.When.witnessmay use copyof documentto refreshmemory.Cap. 14] EVIDENCEBy professionaltreatises.Testimony tofacts stated indocumentmentioned insection 159.(4) An expert may refresh his memory by referenceto professional treatises.160. A witness may also testify to facts mentionedin any such document as is mentioned in section 159,although he has no specific recollection of the factsthemselves, if he is sure that the facts were correctlyrecorded in the document.Right ofadverse partyas to writingused torefreshmemory.IllustrationA book-keeper may testify to facts recorded by him inbooks regularly kept in the course of business, if heknows that the books were correctly kept, although hehas forgotten the particular transactions entered.161. Any writing referred to under the provisionsof the two last preceding sections must be producedand shown to the adverse party if he requires it; suchparty may, if he pleases, cross-examine the witnessthereupon.Productionof documents.Court maytake evidenceto enable itto determineadmissibilityof document.Translation ofdocuments.Giving asevidence, ofdocumentcalled for andproduced onnotice.162 . (1) A witness summoned to produce a document shall, if it is in his possession or power, bring it tocourt, notwithstanding any objection which there maybe to its production or to its admissibility. The validityof any such objection shall be decided on by the court.(2) The court, if it sees fit, may inspect thedocument, unless it refers to matters of State, or takeother evidence to enable it to determine on itsadmissibility.(3) If for such a purpose it is necessary to causeany document to be translated, the court may, if itthinks fit, direct the translator to keep the contentssecret, unless the document is to be given in evidence,and if the interpreter disobeys such direction he shallhe held to have committed an offence under section 162of the Penal Code.163. When a party calls for a document which hehas given the other party notice to produce, and suchdocument is produced and inspected by the party calling for its production he is bound to give it as evidence,if the .party producing it requires him to do so, andif it is relevant.264Cap. 14] EVIDENCEVideorecordedinterview with a childmay be given inevidence.[§ 4, 32 of 1999.]163A. (1) In any proceedings for an offence relating tochild abuse a video recording of a preliminary interviewwhich-(a) is conducted between an adult and a child who is notthe accused in such proceeding (hereinafter referredto in this section as “a child witness”); and(b) relates to any matter is issue in those proceedings,may notwithstanding the provisions of any other law withthe leave of the court, be given in evidence in so far as it isnot excluded by court under subsection (2).(2) Where a video recording is tendered in evidence inany proceedings referred to in subsection (1) the court shallgive leave under that subsection unless-(a) it appears to court, that the child witness will not beavailable for cross examination in such proceedings;or(b) any rules of court requiring the disclosure thecircumstances in which the video recording wasmade have not been complied with to the satisfactionof the court.(3) Where a video recording is given in evidence underthis section-(a) the child witness shall be called by the party whotendered the video recording in evidence;(b) such child witness shall not be examined-in-chief onany matter which in the opinion of the court, hasbeen dealt with in his recorded testimony.(4) Where a video recording is given in evidence underthis section any statement made by the child witness which isdisclosed by the video recording shall be treated as if givenby that child witness in direct oral testimony and accordingly,any such statement shall be admissible evidence of any factof which direct oral testimony from him would be admissible.(5) Where the child witness, in the course of his directoral testimony before court, contradicts, either expressly orby necessary implication, any statement previously made by264AEVIDENCE [Cap. 14him and disclosed by the video recording, it shall be lawfulfor the presiding judge, if he considers it safe and just in allthe circumstances of the case, to act upon such previousstatement as disclosed by the video recording, if such previousstatement is corroborated in material particulars by evidencefrom an independent source.For the purposes of this section-(a) “an offence relating to child abuse” means an offenceunder sections 286A, 308A, 360A, 360B, 360C, 363,364A, 365, 365A or 365B of the Penal Code whencommitted in relation to a child;(b) “child” means a person under eighteen years of age,at the time when the preliminary interview is videorecorded;(c ) “video recording” means any recording in anymedium, from which a moving image may by anymeans be produced and includes the accompanyingsound track.264BEVIDENCE [Cap. 14164. When a party refuses to produce a documentwhich he has had notice to produce, he cannotafterwards use the document as evidence without theconsent of the other party or the order of court.IllustrationUsingevidence, ofdocumentproduction ofwhich wasrefused onnotice.A sues B on an agreement, and gives B notice to produceit. At the trial A calls for the document and B refusesto produce it. A gives secondary evidence of its contents.B seeks to produce the document itself to contradict thesecondary evidence given by A, or in order to showthat the agreement is not stamped. He cannot do so.165. The Judge may, in order to discover or to obtainproper proof of relevant facts, ask any question hepleases, in any form, at any time, of any witness, orof the parties, about any fact relevant or irrelevant;and may order the production of any document orthing; and neither the parties nor their agents shallbe entitled to make any objection to any such questionor order, nor, without the leave of the court, to crossexamine any witness upon any answer given in replyto any such question :Provided that the judgment must be based uponfacts declared by this Ordinance to be relevant andduly proved;Provided also that this section shall not authorizeany Judge to compel any witness to answer any question, or to produce any document, which such witnesswould be entitled to refuse to answer or produce undersections 121 to 131 both inclusive, if the question wereasked or the document were called for by the adverseparty ; nor shall the Judge ask any question which itwould be improper for any other person to ask undersection 148 or 149 ; nor shall he dispense with primaryevidence of any document, excepting the cases hereinbefore excepted.Judge’spower to putquestions ororderproduction.166. In cases tried by jury or with assessors, thejury or assessors may put any questions to the witnesses, through or by leave of the Judge, which the putJudge himself might put, and which he considers questions.proper.265Power ofjury orassessors toCap. 14] EVIDENCECHAPTER XIIINo new trialfor improperadmissionor rejectionof evidence.OF IMPROPER ADMISSION AND REJECTION OF EVIDENCE167. The improper admission or rejection of evidenceshall not be ground of itself for a new trial or reversalof any decisions in any case, if it shall appear to thecourt before which such objection is raised that, independently of the evidence objected to and admitted,there was sufficient evidence to justify the decision,or that, if the rejected evidence had been received, itought not to have varied the decision.266