( 331 )
By the Ordinance of 1876 all movable property to which amarried woman is entitled during her marriage vests absolutelyin her husband, so that presumably the money handed by theplaintiff to her husband Telenis as the consideration for thetransfer was his own money. In other words, the transfer to herwas not for valuable consideration. The defendant is in posses-sion, and the plaintiff has not proved right to the land by virtueof a later transfer for valuable consideration registered prior tothe defendant’s earlier deed.
I dismiss the action.

August 12.