Thus, there is no doubt that the order dated 7.10.97 has beencorrectly made. Further, in the context of an allegation of fraudremaining unresolved against the added defendant-petitioner it is inits best interest to be made a party to this case to have all mattersadjudicated upon effectually, completely and finally.
We, therefore, confirm the order dated 7. 10. 97 of the DistrictJudge of Panadura and dismiss the Revision Application No. 821/97and refuse to grant leave in C.A.L.A. No. 197/97 and dismiss sametoo. The added defendant-petitioner and the plaintiff-respondent shalleach pay Rs.10,500 as costs of these two applications to thedefendant-respondent (in all Rs. 21,000).