Loos A.J.—t
am so entirely in accord with the conclusions arrived at by myBrother de Sampayo, before whom and myself the appeal wasoriginally argued, and with the . reasons stated in his judgment,which I have had the advantage of reading, that it is unnecessaryfor me to add anything.
In my opinion section 6 of the Ordinance No. 12 of 1840 specifi-cally indicates the only methods by which the presumption infavour of the Crown can be rebutted. . I agree to the order proposedby my Brother de Sampayo.
Appeal allowed.