Category / NLR
PERIS v. PERERA
052-NLR-NLR-V-06-PERIS-v.-PERERA.pdf ï»ż 1899. July JJf. đ 230 ) PERIS v. PERERA. D. C., Ratnapura, 2,395. DecreeâRevival' ofâDelay in recovery of judgment-debtâOld procedureâ Civil Procedure Code, ts. 2, 5, and 337âEffect of repeal of s. 5 of Ordinance No. 22 of 1871. The plaintiff, having obtained judgment against the defendant in 1882,took out a writ of…
THE KING v. PEIRIS APPUHAMY et al
095-NLR-NLR-V-43-THE-KING-v.-PEIRIS-APPUHAMY-et-al.pdf ï»ż 412 1942 The King v. Peiris Appnhamy. [Court of Criminal Appeal.] Present: Howard C.J., Keuneman and Cannon JJ. THE KING v. PEIRIS APPUHAMY et oL13âM. C. Dandagamuwa, 9,841. AccompliceâQuestion of mixed fact and law for JuryâDuty of Judge to warnJury as to necessity of corroborationâTo explain the law as to whatconstitutes corroborationâWhat association…
MUTTIAH CHETTY v.KARUPAIYA KANKANI
068-NLR-NLR-V-06-MUTTIAH-CHETTY-v.KARUPAIYA-KANKANI.pdf ï»ż ( 285 ) MUTTIAH CHETTY v. KARUPAIYA KANKANI.D. Câ Kandy, U,376. 1903. March 30. Principal and agentâAuthority of one of two agents appointed by power ofattorney to carry on the business of the principalâValidity of promissorynote signed by one agent. Where an authority is given to two or more persons to do an…
POPE v. ABDULLA
111-NLR-NLR-V-43-POPE-v.-ABDULLA.pdf ï»ż KEUNEMAN J.âPope v. Abdulla.467_ 1942Present: Soertsz and Keuneman JJ. POPE v. ABDULLA.93âD. C. Colombo, 2,605. BankâPayment of money to BankâUndials issued to persons living in placeswhere the Bank has otherâ branchesâBank in liquidationâRights ofDepositor. A merchant, who has to pay money to persons living in towns in Indiain which a Bank has branches,…
ABERAJENDERA v. GOVERNMENTAGENT CENTRAL PROVINCE
084-NLR-NLR-V-06-ABERAJENDERA-v.-GOVERNMENTAGENT-CENTRAL-PROVINCE.pdf ï»ż ( 852 ) IMS.March 20. ABERAJENDBRA v. GOVERNMENT AGENT, CENTRAL PROVINCE. D. C., Kandy, 11. Forest, chena, waste, or unoccupied landsâOrdinance No. 1 of 1897âBightof private individual to withdraw from proceedings begun under tkerOrdinanceâSection 19 of Ordinance No. 1 of 1897 and Civil ProcedureCode, s. 408. 11 a person interested in a forest,…
THE KING v. MARTHINO et al
127-NLR-NLR-V-43-THE-KING-v.-MARTHINO-et-al.pdf ï»ż 521 DE KRETSER J.âThe King v. Marthino. [Court of Criminal Appeal.] Present: Soertsz, Keuneman, and de Kretser JJ. THE KING v. MARTHINO et al. 29âM. C. Anuradhapwra, 2,880. Court of Criminal appealâApplication for leave to appeal on the factsâ-Application to add fresh ground of appealâLeave refused. Where, on an application for leave to…
PANIS APPUHAMY v. SELENCHI APPU et al
006-NLR-NLR-V-07-PANIS-APPUHAMY-v.-SELENCHI-APPU-et-al.pdf ï»ż ( 16 ) 1903. April 2 andMay 6. PANIS APPUHAMY u. SELENCHI APPU et al. O., Negombo, 4,492. LeaseâAction for rentâLiability of joint lesseesâConstruction of deed of leaseâIntention of partiesâObligation in solidum. When two or more persons have joined in stipulating for the paymentof a certain sum of money, each is ordinarily liable…
BODIGA et al, Appellants, and NAGOOR, Respondent
001-NLR-NLR-V-45-BODIGA-et-al-Appellants-and-NAGOOR-Respondent.pdf ï»ż THE NEW LAW REPORTS OF CEYLON,VOLUME XLV. 1953Present: Howard C.J. and Kenneman J.BODIGA et al, Appellants, and NAGOOR, Respondent. 217âD. G. Kandy, 738. MortgageâSale of property to mortgagor set aside on ground of laesio enormia-âBuyer consents to decree setting aside saleâMortgage unaffected byannulment of sale. Where a sale of property is set aside…
PUNCHIRALA v. APPUHAMY
022-NLR-NLR-V-07-PUNCHIRALA-v.-APPUHAMY.pdf ï»ż ( 102 ) 1900. PUNCHIRALA v. APPUHAMY. âecember 6,and1901. tbruary 14. D. C., Kandy, 11,584. Registration of deedsâUnregistered mortgage bond of intestateâRegistered deedof sale by administratorâPriorityâRegistration Ordinance No. 14 of1891â-Civil Procedure Code, s. 547âProof, of title to property throughintestate. The registration of letters of administration or of grant of probatedoes not avoid an…
ELLAWALLA, Appellant, and INSPECTOR OF POLICE, Respondent
018-NLR-NLR-V-45-ELLAWALLA-Appellant-and-INSPECTOR-OF-POLICE-Respondent.pdf ï»ż 60 Ellawalla and Inspector of Police. :I944Present âą Moseley S.P.J. ELLAWALLA, Appellant, and INSPECTOR OP POLICE, Respondent. 834â-M. G. Colombo, 2,279. tCheatingâOnefalserepresentationâThreeoffencesâContinuingrepresenta- tionâPenal Code, s. 398. Where, on the strength of one expressed representation, which was.false the accused was charged with three offences of cheating, committedwithin the course of three monthsâ Held, that…