Category / NLR_V_24
SUPPRAMANIAM CHETTY v. JAYAWARDENE et al
012-NLR-NLR-V-24-SUPPRAMANIAM-CHETTY-v.-JAYAWARDENE-et-al.pdf ( 50 ) 1992. Present: T)e Sampayo and Schneider JJ.SUPPRAMANIAM CHETTY v. JAYAWARDENE el ad. 30 and 30a—D. C. Badullu, 3,169. Mistaken view on the part of the Fiscal's officer as to the identity of theproperty seized—Is sale invalid 1■—Inherent potoers of the Courtin respect of a party who obstructs the execution of…
THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL v. APPUHAMY
028-NLR-NLR-V-24-THE-ATTORNEY-GENERAL-v.-APPUHAMY.pdf ( 112 ) 1922. Present: De Sampayo and Schneider JJ. THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL a. APPUHAMY393—D. C. Key alia, 5,056 Ordinance No. 12 of 1640, s. 6—At tchat point of time must tenuis beckenag for the presumption, created by the Ordinance 1—Docs thepresumption apply in any proceeding outside the Ordinance *Does the presumption apply •…
FERNANDO v. SABARATNAM
045-NLR-NLR-V-24-FERNANDO-v.-SABARATNAM.pdf ( 161 ) 'Present; De Sampayo and Porter JJ. FERNANDO t>. SABARATNAM.155—D. C. Colombo, 47,785. Arbitrator's fee—District Judge firing the amount of the fee and directingeach parly to pay an equal share after decree—Jurisdiction. After decree -was entered in terms of an award, the arbitratorasked for his fee, and the District Judge fixed…
RANASINGHE v. PERERA
061-NLR-NLR-V-24-RANASINGHE-v.-PERERA.pdf ( 201 ) Present : Ennis and Schneider JJ. 1922. RANASINGHE r. PERERA. 54 ■ -D. C. Colombo, 52,355* Alimony—Application by wife for enhancement—Civil Procedure Code, There is no provision tor the enhancement of alimony on theapplication of a wife. HE respondent in this action sued the appellant lor divorce on the ground…
BANDARANAYAKE v. BANDARANAYAKE
077-NLR-NLR-V-24-BANDARANAYAKE-v.-BANDARANAYAKE.pdf ( 245 ) Present : Ennis and De Samp&yo JJ.BANDARANAYAKE v. BANDARANAYAKE 1922 – 129—D. C. Kandy, 29,546. Kandyan teaman marrying a Low-country Sinhalese—Matrimonial rightsof the parties. Where aKandyanSinhalesewoman. marries a low-cotmtry Sinhalese, her matrimonial rights are governed by the Kandyanlaw and not by Ordinance Ho. 15 of 2876. A KandyanSinhalese is nota…
PETER et al. v. CAROLIS et al
093-NLR-NLR-V-24-PETER-et-al.-v.-CAROLIS-et-al.pdf ( 286 ) 1922. Present: Bertram C.J. and Schneider J. PETER et al. v. CAROLIS et al. 491—D. C. Qalle, 18,808. Lease by administratrix—Conveyance to heir after lease—Lessee oustedby administratrix after she became functus officio—Action fordamages and cancellation of lease against administratrix by lessee—Judgment for lessee—Seizure of leased property by lesseeunder writ for…
APPUHAMY v. PETER SINGHO
109-NLR-NLR-V-24-APPUHAMY-v.-PETER-SINGHO.pdf ( 859 ) Present : Jayewardene A.J. APPUHAMY v. PETER SINGHO. 55—C. B. Rurunegala, 25,433. Registration—Consolidation of two lands—Field and high land adjoiningthereto—Grantee sole owner of one land and owner of half shareof the other. Two distinct lands, of one of which a person is sole ownerand of the other of which he…
POOVILANGAM CHETTY v. ANTHONY
125-NLR-NLR-V-24-POOVILANGAM-CHETTY-v.-ANTHONY.pdf ( 417 •) Present: De Sampayo and Schneider JJ. POOVILANGAM CHETTY v. ANTHONY. 216—D. C. Colombo, 3,077. Contract to deliver naked mill oil at buyer's store.—Oil sent in bigcasks which buyer was unable to unload—Seller not bound to unload..or send oil in smaller easks t Plaintiff entered into a contraet to supply to…
APPUHAMY et al. v. WILLIAM SINGHO et al
141-NLR-NLR-V-24-APPUHAMY-et-al.-v.-WILLIAM-SINGHO-et-al.pdf ( 472 ) 1982* Present: De Sampayo and Schneider JJ.APPUHAMY et al. v. WILLIAM SINGHO et «Z.140— (Inty.) Kegalla, 5,-559. Action by lessees for cancellation of /«u#r—One plaintiff becoming lunatic,pending action, and disappearing—Right of other plaintiff to goon with the actioti. Plaintiffs who were lessees instituted uu action for the cancellationof a lease.…
DIAS v. NIKKO
013-NLR-NLR-V-24-DIAS-v.-NIKKO.pdf m ( 54 ) Present: Bertram C.J. DIAS v. NIKKO. 63— C. R. Galle, 2,564. Action for trespass—-Constructive possession of plaintiff. Mere constructive possession is not a sufficient basis for anaction for trespass. rJ*' HE tacts appear front the judgment. Soertsz, for plaintiff, appellant. Keuneman, for defendant, respondent. August 25, 1922. Bertram G.J.—…